Burandt said 4lbs over comparable model and noted that most of that is in the gauge and battery for the gauge.Looks like the n.a gained 10 ish pounds
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Burandt said 4lbs over comparable model and noted that most of that is in the gauge and battery for the gauge.Looks like the n.a gained 10 ish pounds
What does the difference of the Khaos geometry do compared to the Pro?Khaos geometry. The Khoas comes standard with the Velocity shocks. The Pro comes standard with the Walker Evans monotubes with the option to upgrade to the Velocity- which are NON high/low compression adjustable. Just standard compression adjustment on the Pro.
Where doo you suppose the e start battery goes? Hopefully you have another kit. Your kaos kit is awesome for the axysI am willing to bet that it has more cooling then the previous chassis... with the finned cooler and its location up towards the bulkhead, it will create more surface area on the cooler and the cooler will collect more snow also with it being up towards the front of the bulkhead.
If your worried about cooling get the regular matrix instead of the slash. The cooler is shorter on the slash.
25lbs give or take. Khaos geometry means lighter riding, easier to get on edge, more wheelie.Also how much does the boost add in weight?
That's the Khaos now.What happened to the SKS lineup? They were so popular in my area for crossover riding (146) or the guys who rode prairie's and mountains (155).
Where we rode, we had 15ish miles of grinned road to get to the hills. We rode that section HARD.No SKS kinda stinks. Interested in the 146 Khaos but worried about cooling on the trail
Check post #2 in this thread.Yes. Exact
Same front and rear suspension as the Axys I wonder? Thinking shock options.
That would be me.I hate sleds that run hot in marginal snow. I sure would like to hear from someone who has tried one in these conditions. With the Slash having less cooling is a concern.
Absolutely.Cooling system likely is some. Centralized mass should ride lighter though, as well as less ice build up on the back
Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
it's tunnel wide under the seat now and finned. you probably have 5times more surface with the finned designI hate sleds that run hot in marginal snow. I sure would like to hear from someone who has tried one in these conditions. With the Slash having less cooling is a concern.
I am curious too. What is the point of the a shorter tunnel?Not sure if I am going to phrase this right or not but with a shorter tunnel 155" would that somewhat take away the need or desire to go 165"? Would the short tunnel 155" go through the deeper snow more like a standard 165"?
I did take the 650 146" out. It was electric start and 2" track. I swapped with my buddy Dan Gardiner half way through without telling him what it was. He came back and said, "it feels lazy" I then informed him it was a 650 146 with 2" and electric start. It was impressive for what it did at 8000 feet.I know the turbo is getting the press but I'm wondering about how the 650 did at elevation and the specs of that 146 track.