So wait, let me get this straight, everyone else's boost gauges, whether computerized or mechanical, are wrong and by a large amount, but the Vipec is spot on? Is there some kind of proprietary space age unobtanium sensor that is used in this system that no one else can get? I'm by no means trying to bag on Vipec, but I mean really. I don't quite understand why this is the only boost gauge/sensor that works, and everyone else is junk.
Personally. I have an EBC, that I set my boost on at idle, and it then reads out what the boost is, throughout the entire throttle range as it builds. Should that not be sufficient, I have a mechanical gauge that I can tee into my boost line to check and make sure that the solenoid is reading accurately. When I have used this gauge, I have always been under 1PSI differential, either way.
All that said, I completely agree with philsummers, I could care less what the actual # is when I am riding. If I need more, I add more. If I need less, I take some away. It depends on the day and the terrain and the snow. I can go from the minimum of my WG, to as much as I can hold on to.
Last thing, I will suggest that the reason some of you are seeing "better" low boost performance with the HM kit, is that it is a much lighter duty, variable vane turbo, that is by nature, designed to lag less. That is the true benefit of an Aero turbo. I am not going to get into why I do not run an Aero on my sled, as that is my personal preference and opinions, and I am not trying to bash anyones product. I have reasons why I prefer the Garrett, and with the proper tuning, turbo size, housing and wheel, I feel very confident that I can get the bottom end, every bit as snappy as an Aero (the boost being tied into the TPS makes a big difference as well).