Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Help on 600 jetting and clutching setup

S

sc freeride

New member
I'm posting this for my uncle, who has a 2006 (I think) 600 Hawk. Our elevation is roughly 1000'-1500', and the temps have been anywhere from 0-30 lately. The machine is brand new and came with the DPM, which to my understanding should compensate for elevation and temperature changes, although I'm not sure if it works like a Holtzman and you jet it for the baseline and it leans it out from there--Regardless, he has it jetted with 380s for this location, and it runs great. The problems occur when the sled gets to higher elevations.

He's had it in the Black Hills and in Colorado, elevations of roughly 6500' and 11,000', respectively. In the Hills, I think he ran 410s-420s, somewhere in there, expecting the DPM to compensate. The sled ran horribly. It had an incredible dead spot until around 4200 rpm, where it would take off. As long as it was above that it ran pretty well. I don't think he ever hit 8000 rpm, even after pulling discs out of the clutch. The machine was a bear to start, easily 30 pulls on a couple occasions.

After he got it home (where the problems don't seem to exist) he switched to 380s, and took it in that form to CO. It seemed to plague him more there. The machine wouldn't run any differently with jetting down to 280s, and most of the weights out of the clutch. On the trail he got to the point of having to push it up the hills (for lack of power), and in the meadow at full throttle it would just die, like the kill switch got hit. He said it took two guys to start it--one to pull until too tired, one to pull after that and get it going. I think he had to run it on full choke most of the time. He had his fuel/air screw anywhere from 1 1/2 turns out to 3 turns out, no noticeable difference. I think he said he's got 17.5 pilots in it. I could be wrong, since I have 50s in my 503 and the difference in the numbering system confuses me.

I think we're all at our wits end trying to figure this setup out. It's very hard to do testing since we're 400 miles away from suitable testing elevations. We're headed to the Big Horns in a couple weeks and want to have it run well. I think he's going to try and take off the DPM, since that's where all the bumpy roads seeming run to (in our minds, anyway).

If anyone has tips for removing the DPM please let me know. I haven't looked at it, and for all I know he's already got it taken off. Other than that, we're looking for someone that has a proven setup with or without the DPM. The machine has stock exhaust, and nothing else has been done to it.

Thanks,
Dan
 
You might mean MPEM.

Which is common on all liquid machines not a DPM, the 2006 machines came stock for sea level with 420 mains, all before 350, so drastically downsizing will be required. The machine may have run better because it was still new and breaking in which explains working well before.
The only alltitude compensators used by AD Boivin were the acc. ATTAC brand which attatches by small hoses to the carbs or air box.

Find out your elevation where you will be going and start with all light weights removed from primary.
Make sure exhaust tip points away at angle from track so in deep conditions it is not cloging itself.

Have jet ranges between 250-310 and dial it in.

Tony
 
You're right, it definitely says MPEM on the 'box' on the top. I understood that it had DPM, but I don't know enough about it. You're probably right that's it's the ATACC system, as I know it has the insert nipple in the top cover of one of the carbs. I had VariFlow on my old sled and it had the insert nipple, but rather than in the cover it was mounted in the side of the mag carb. The system didn't come on it from the factory, it was dealer added.

As far as running better, I might need to clarify that. It's been run at home (1500') with both 420s(?) and then downsized to 380s. I've been told it now has the snort of my 503, which it didn't have before. As far as at elevation, the sled has refused to run well. That's why I'm convinced it's in the altitude/temp compensator. If anyone else runs the ATACC, please let me know if it works well for you on this motor. Also, if you have it, where is the inlet nipple into the carb located? I had Mikuni TMX carbs and was told they were extremely picky with the nipple placement, just curious if that may be an issue here.

I considered the exhaust getting plugged in the powder, but dismissed that after seeing that it didn't run any better on groomed trails. As for clutching, I'm thinking it may clear up if the rest of this problem is solved, and the setup seems too straightforward to mess up.
 
Still too rich!

AD B was playing it safe for warrantee purp. and confusing folks with the quiet exhaust at 1500 you should be around 300-310 and feel it come alive!

Ever ride a good running SKI-DOO 600, just like 800 Hawks nobody "NEEDS" one they just think want!

Don't "attack" me now I'm just stating that a 600 has more than enough to put most on their A$$!:D
 
Thanks for the info guys, but I think he's happy with the way it runs at home here. He's run it across an open field and checked the plugs, which look good. The problem only exists when there's a large change in elevation. I'm not sure how much increase it needs to run poorly, but at a 5000' change (to 6500'), the sled falls on it's face. I had the opportunity to ride it, and when it goes it's a blast, but there is absolutely no low end. It was hard to get out of a stuck because we couldn't idle it out, it was all or nothing. In the trees if you slowed down for something, you had a good chance of being stuck before the throttle response came back. It just doesn't seem to be a main jet issue, as all of that has been played yet there is no increase in drivability. I'd like to take a closer look at the ATACC system to see if it's installed correctly. I read on the Holtzman site, and it was clear the mounting in the air box should be high above the carbs, yet it seems to me (if it's similar to the 503) that's not even close to the case.

If those replying have a 600, please let me know if you have the ATACC.

I don't want this to sound like we're trying to get it to run perfectly smooth. While that may be an issue to deal with down the road, this machine is barely rideable at any elevation. I don't think many people on this forum would be Hawk fans if they had to push them up a hill in the trail! We're just looking for something that might make this easier to sort out. All the replies are appreciated, keep them coming!
 
Take the advice.

Even with an ATTAC the Pig Farmer, Keith's 800Trail only needed to be a few sizes richer 420's then say Cailen's 390's without at Hawk Fest.

The ATTAC only covers so much change, unike a true DPM in a Summit powerplant which can work form 0-14k.

Jets only effect so much, as the needle rises things change.

Or just keep pushing, but please get it on Youtube, need more Snow Hawk vids.:D
 
Haha, I'm sure that's exactly the video he'd want with his Hawk.

The Atacc compensates up to 8000', so for the Black Hills it should have been fine with stock jetting. In CO, where it was a 10,000' difference, I could understand why it wouldn't have worked correctly without a jet change, but he did change the jets out to 280s. It's my understanding that to 'reset' the compensator, there's a cylinder that needs to be unplugged to reset it's atmospheric pressure. That would possibly explain things in CO, but the Black Hills is still a mystery, as there isn't any reason I can think of why it shouldn't have compensated.

One thing I did see on the Holtzman site is that the Atacc isn't recommended for 2001-2002 Ski Doos with TM Flatslides. It's probably a stupid question, but there isn't a chance that the '06 Hawks had an older designed motor in them, is there?

Instead of asking if anyone successfully runs an Atacc on a 600, I should maybe ask if anyone has even heard or seen of someone that has successfully run this device on a 600 Hawk.

Thanks,
Dan
 
Hawkdoggen no stagger?

You guys don't like to stagger your jets? I think it is a good thing to do with the Ski DOo motors. They seem to always run hot on the clutch side.
 
Sometimes but just by reading plugs or looking at piston wash , ours have been looking almost perfectly identical from mag to pto , I havent had an egt on any . My sleds are staggered but ive just had good luck on my hawks staight so i guess what the machine wants it gets ! LOL :D
 
I had the exact same symptoms on my 800 SCFreeride at '08 Hawkfest, the sunday that temperature was way over the freezing point. And I run the attac too. I was too rich. Guys who had great result that day with 800s (Cailen & Joel) had (correct me if i'm wrong) 390s (stock is 490s). I ended up blowing my silencer because of too much unburnt gas accumulation in there, then when I started it, it ignited & blew off !

Besides elevation, there's also temperature to take in consideration. If it's hotter you'll have to go down of course.
This is a jetting problem, you'll be able to do some clutching troubleshootout when you'll get the motor to run "ok".

And I heard the Attac will only compensate for 3000'. I'm reading what they gave me with my machine on the Attac but doesn't mention for how much it compensates.
 
Tony,
That You Tube link was funny, But once again I just don't have a clue why you choose to single me out for the post?

What is your point?

•Great minds discuss ideas.
-Good minds discuss events.
-Small minds discuss people.
 
that was a good bid...

he didnt have his glasses on and couldnt really see the 2 bikes....he thought they were 2 brand new snowhawks! he was a bit off when he did say 250,000 though....
 
Premium Features



Back
Top