Global warming?? Wheres my coat?
- Thread starter Ollie
- Start date
HAHA so many noses bent out of shape... Holy cow..LMAO
Ollie, where in your article did it say global warming??
Let me try to edumacate you tards.
Studies show there is a warming of the earth as a whole, I believe it has increased 0.32 °F during the last century. It may not seem like a lot, but enough to melt polar caps faster and keep once frozen channels open during the winters.
How many U.S. towns would be underwater, let alone the state of Florida if the water rose 1 meter? Not that it matters...
I myself think there is a warming of the earth as a whole. not just "aww man my summer is the coolest ever, so it is not happening.."
Be it from Human causes? I doubt it, the forests of the world give off 1000% more CO2 in the evening than all the cars combined.
We are on the outskirts an ice age, and history has proven that temp fluctuations occur all the time.
So if all you sally think I insulted you, well you probably deserve it.
Ollie, where in your article did it say global warming??
Let me try to edumacate you tards.
Studies show there is a warming of the earth as a whole, I believe it has increased 0.32 °F during the last century. It may not seem like a lot, but enough to melt polar caps faster and keep once frozen channels open during the winters.
How many U.S. towns would be underwater, let alone the state of Florida if the water rose 1 meter? Not that it matters...
I myself think there is a warming of the earth as a whole. not just "aww man my summer is the coolest ever, so it is not happening.."
Be it from Human causes? I doubt it, the forests of the world give off 1000% more CO2 in the evening than all the cars combined.
We are on the outskirts an ice age, and history has proven that temp fluctuations occur all the time.
So if all you sally think I insulted you, well you probably deserve it.
Last edited:
Last edited:
HAHA so many noses bent out of shape... Holy cow..LMAO
Ollie, where in your article did it say global warming??
Let me try to edumacate you tards.
Studies show there is a warming of the earth as a whole, I believe it has increased 0.32 °F during the last century. It may not seem like a lot, but enough to melt polar caps faster and keep once frozen channels open during the winters.
How many U.S. towns would be underwater, let alone the state of Florida if the water rose 1 meter? Not that it matters...
I myself think there is a warming of the earth as a whole. not just "aww man my summer is the coolest ever, so it is not happening.."
Be it from Human causes? I doubt it, the forests of the world give off 1000% more CO2 in the evening than all the cars combined.
We are on the outskirts an ice age, and history has proven that temp fluctuations occur all the time.
So if all you sally think I insulted you, well you probably deserve it.
Correct me if I am wrong, but I was taught in school that forests (trees, etc) convert CO2 into oxygen (O2). If forests infact cause CO2, then what on earth cleans it all up?
Furthermore, don't cars produce largely Carbon MONOXIDE (CO)?
I realize I have been out of school for a few years, but I am pretty sure of this^^^.
It has been proven that global climate change occurs on its own and these small temperature swings are completely normal, as much as the environmentalists would like us to believe otherwise.
Exhibit "A" your honor/.//
I agree
O
Ollie
ACCOUNT CLOSED
Marcuso
You would be correct.
World temps as a whole have increased over the last 1000 years or so.
If they hadn't, we would still be under a few feet of ice from the last ice age.
HOWEVER......
All the current data shows we are headed into a mini-ice age that is estimated to last from 20 - 30 years with temps falling. We won't be seeing florida under ice, but you will see lower temps world wide and more ice build up at either pole.
As for the tard comment, we were just poking fun at the global warming nuts and talking about how cool this summer has been, that is until you came along and turned it into a name calling session.
But hey, what do we expect from the queen of unsigned red.
You would be correct.
World temps as a whole have increased over the last 1000 years or so.
If they hadn't, we would still be under a few feet of ice from the last ice age.
HOWEVER......
All the current data shows we are headed into a mini-ice age that is estimated to last from 20 - 30 years with temps falling. We won't be seeing florida under ice, but you will see lower temps world wide and more ice build up at either pole.
As for the tard comment, we were just poking fun at the global warming nuts and talking about how cool this summer has been, that is until you came along and turned it into a name calling session.
But hey, what do we expect from the queen of unsigned red.
LMFAO, guess I will refrain from making any comments about the weather again, would not want to start a "hate" thread.
Who was name calling? I said
Guess if someone was retarded, they could take it seriously....
I still believe some were actually serious. Just making the point that global warming is not "this summer's local forecast"... it is data recorded over the last 130 years... 'tis all.
Guess if someone was retarded, they could take it seriously....
I still believe some were actually serious. Just making the point that global warming is not "this summer's local forecast"... it is data recorded over the last 130 years... 'tis all.
Last edited:
Geeze Marco, even I know they were just talking about their personal experiences. Exactly what do you want them to say, even the freaking experts don't understand all of the interaction that summate to accurately predict future temperature trends, it's too complicated.
Now, what the heck do you want a formula or something.
Yha, plants take in CO2 during the day, and emits it during the night. It's lifetime net intake of CO2 is positive, you know this because the plant is a carbon based life form, and almost all the carbon came from CO2. For example half the weight of a tree is water, a quarter of the weight is carbon, the rest is other stuff, nitrogen, minerals, etc...
The exact equation goes something like this
6 CO2 + 12 H2O + Energy => C6H12O6 + 6 O2 + 6 H2O
CO2 + H20 + light energy => glucose(sugar) + O2 + H2O
The reason for 12 H20 going in, and 6 coming out, is because the light phtons are only powerful enough to partially disassociate the one hydrogen, producing H + HO (hydrogen + hydrogen hydroxide). Breaking the second hydrogen from the oxygen takes much more energy, so you only get some long term recombination. That part I'm not completely clear on, oh well.
At night when the light is gone, the plant burns glucose to stay alive, it's called CELLULAR RESPIRATION
C6H12O6 (glucose sugar) + 6O2 => 6CO2 + 6H2O
It gets "eats" sugar the same way our body does; at night.
People on here aren't stupid. They just like to talk about things they've noticed. Now if this where a greenies sight, everyone would be talking about their "emotional feelings".
Troll on.
Now, what the heck do you want a formula or something.
Yha, plants take in CO2 during the day, and emits it during the night. It's lifetime net intake of CO2 is positive, you know this because the plant is a carbon based life form, and almost all the carbon came from CO2. For example half the weight of a tree is water, a quarter of the weight is carbon, the rest is other stuff, nitrogen, minerals, etc...
The exact equation goes something like this
6 CO2 + 12 H2O + Energy => C6H12O6 + 6 O2 + 6 H2O
CO2 + H20 + light energy => glucose(sugar) + O2 + H2O
The reason for 12 H20 going in, and 6 coming out, is because the light phtons are only powerful enough to partially disassociate the one hydrogen, producing H + HO (hydrogen + hydrogen hydroxide). Breaking the second hydrogen from the oxygen takes much more energy, so you only get some long term recombination. That part I'm not completely clear on, oh well.
At night when the light is gone, the plant burns glucose to stay alive, it's called CELLULAR RESPIRATION
C6H12O6 (glucose sugar) + 6O2 => 6CO2 + 6H2O
It gets "eats" sugar the same way our body does; at night.
People on here aren't stupid. They just like to talk about things they've noticed. Now if this where a greenies sight, everyone would be talking about their "emotional feelings".
Troll on.
Last edited:
Who was name calling? I said
Guess if someone was retarded, they could take it seriously....
I still believe some were actually serious. Just making the point that global warming is not "this summer's local forecast"... it is data recorded over the last 130 years... 'tis all.
Why 130 years? On a 4 billion year old planet, why is that time frame relevant?
Here is what it has been like for 4500 years. Not like the hockey stick the greenies show, they do not like the true data. Oh and we are below the normal for that time period. So there Marcuso http://www.longrangeweather.com/global_temperatures.htm
Last edited:
Wade;1649657 said:
O
Ollie
ACCOUNT CLOSED
I read the title...
oops I thought this thread was about global warming... my bad.
Wade, go back and read the posts... to answer your question about the 130 years.
oops I thought this thread was about global warming... my bad.
Wade, go back and read the posts... to answer your question about the 130 years.
Or reread mine we are below normal for a 4500 year time frame.
Sorry, I must have not explained... I meant accurate temperature recording instruments
http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/detect/global-temps.shtml
oops I thought this thread was about global warming... my bad.
Wade, go back and read the posts... to answer your question about the 130 years.
Just referring to your statement, which though technically accurate, is very misleading.
"Be it from Human causes? I doubt it, the forests of the world give off 1000% more CO2 in the evening than all the cars combined."
I searched the entire thread for 130, nowhere but my question, and your statement.
The good news is, I'm not that smart. I screwed up the hydrogen disassociation part. In plants, it's a two step process, that fully disassociates the hydrogens. My bad. I was thinking of a stream reformer for hydrogen generation. Sorry. Luckily there's google.
Last edited:
hmmm, accurate...???...well if you were brought up being told an apple was an orange and an orange was an apple....is the apple an orange...what is accurate..??
Similar threads
