F
finnpacoutdoors
Member
Sorry I'm busy crying in my soup
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The last 10 years have seen the buying power of the average american shrink (net reduction in wages) yet the salaries for the rich have increased by a tremendous amount. I don't think it is right that during an economic boom, the only real benefits are shown at the top. What do you guys think about that?
QUOTE]
i think thats BS.so im out![]()
I was kind of joking... hence the smilie with the tongue sticking out? You didn't think he was just going for a window did you?Come on rr, you asked a reasonable question but when you didn't get a direct answer you got condecending again. (Start a sentence like this...)
Anyway, I think the point will correct itself as soon as it is reached because if the gap gets too big the wealthy can not support themselves at that level without contributions from the middle class. If the middle can't buy goods and services fast enough to keep the rich rich, the gap will close untill the rich are closer to the middle. That opens the oportunities for some in the middle to climb to the top for the next cycle. The same can be true to some extent for the middle / poor gap. In either case, sooner or later when the gap closes there will be opportunities to move up with hard work and a little luck.
I probably still didn't give you a satisfactory answer, but I don't think there is a definate point. What do you think?
i think thats BS.so im out![]()
I was kind of joking... hence the smilie with the tongue sticking out? You didn't think he was just going for a window did you?
I think you did great! Someone get this guy a button!!(Smilie = joke!! lol)
If it gets too large, it becomes unsustainable. Just like the current situation, there will be a "thinning of the herd".
Sounds like the commycrats are trying to get the middle class to rebel against the wealthy. You studying marx Ruffy??? To take away the goals and aspirations of the middle class and get them to resent the wealthy is pure communism. The north American society is not feudal. The reward for working hard and saving is removed by resenting the wealthy. News flash quit whining and go to work, save and be thrifty with your money and see what happens. Merely throwing good money after bad {Stimulus}, without ever addressing the root causes of the problem is WRONG! Big brother is growing and flexing his muscles every second that you folks have this clown ruining things. To attempt to incite bitter feelings amongst the working class is the final step for the Libby agenda. The poor folks in the russia understand this better than we do. They have supported a communistic uuprising almost 100 years ago, Ruffy ask most common Russians today if they think Communism was a very great concept. Sounds to me like a attempt to pizz off the middle class so you and your friends can finally have your Socialist republic. SOCIALISM CANNOT WORK EVER! Someone somewhere has to pay for it. History tells us that in a socialist state the have nots end up having even less. Ruffy go to Cuba or China and see what your thoughts really do for all but 1/10th of a percent. Rant over will wait for the lame predictable response.
When is too much? Is there such a thing as too much? The last 10 years have seen the buying power of the average american shrink (net reduction in wages) yet the salaries for the rich have increased by a tremendous amount. I don't think it is right that during an economic boom, the only real benefits are shown at the top. What do you guys think about that?
I do agree that a successfull person has a right to have a lot of money. I do agree that you shouldn't get paid to do nothing in life. Welfare is a handout not a hand up, which people should get instead.
But, as money = power, having a majority of the wealth in fewer and fewer hands scares me.
What are your thoughts?
ok Ruffy, the long answer.
Tried to be brief last time.
(I do so love our little conversations)
No, there is no top cap.
As someone pointed out, a guy spent 3.5 million on his b-day party.
That 3.5 million was spent to pay people to do what he wanted for his party.
Do I think that's nuts sure, but it illistrates my point.
When you have super rich people they spend stupid amounts of money. Once that money is spent it goes into the pockets of the working class.
In order to get super rich you have to do something. You have to own something, you have to PAY OTHER PEOPLE TO MAKE THE MONEY FOR YOU.
The super rich don't work the way most people think of work. They hire people to make the money for them. The more they make the more people it takes to make that money.
Lets take a well known figure.
Donald Trump.
Do you know how many thousands of people work for him?
He is considered to be super rich (he has had his ups and downs but still super rich).
He has created hundreds of millionairs.
He employs 10's of thousands of people.
Thousands more people look to him as inspiration to succeed. They want to be him.
Take away his money, you take away the inspiration.
The government under Obama is taxing the american dream to death.
There is no "he has too much money".
Only to many politicians who want to buy votes by stealing from the rich to give to the undeserving.
Do you think there is a point though?
When is too much? Is there such a thing as too much? The last 10 years have seen the buying power of the average american shrink (net reduction in wages) yet the salaries for the rich have increased by a tremendous amount. I don't think it is right that during an economic boom, the only real benefits are shown at the top. What do you guys think about that?
I do agree that a successfull person has a right to have a lot of money. I do agree that you shouldn't get paid to do nothing in life. Welfare is a handout not a hand up, which people should get instead.
But, as money = power, having a majority of the wealth in fewer and fewer hands scares me.
What are your thoughts?
The Point I missed in my Rambling is this.
Most people don't save any money, They and myself included want everything!! (i save a lot but still want to much) in the old days we did not have so much stuff. The guy that works for me that I talked about before is not well of but pizzes his money away. people don't save to buy anything the just get a loan. I save and then buy. It is so much harder to get out from under something than it is to save then get it but no one wants to wait "I WANT IT NOW"
That is why some people will never have any money.
here is something I have said before. If you took everyones money away then gave everyone $10,000 I would bet the same people would end up rich again, For the most part anyway. Most would just pizz the 10K away but the smart working people would be rich again.
.
Everyone wants to keep up with the "Jones'", so you buy buy buy. Everyone wants a status symbol and to better than the average Joe. Everyone is so worried about it, that it becomes a sickness and here debt comes into play.