• Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.
H
Nov 29, 2013
20
0
1
Okay, I moved the clamps back. I used some previously drilled holes. They may be a bit too far back, but hopefully it's better then where I had them.
I'm crossing my fingers that I'll finally be able to enjoy a ride!
Thanks again for your advice!

IMG_1937.jpg
 

Jon Mutiger

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Oct 20, 2010
464
125
43
49
Maple Ridge, BC
I've seen it where the lower most part of the ski bracket is installed backwards, perhaps that's the case here?

Take a pic and post it up of the way your ski/spindle looks from the side

Jon
 
X
Oct 6, 2010
73
26
18
64
Isn't that a gen II Ski

The Gen II is a hand full I still have one on 1 of our 2011 MH.

The new T/S ski is better than the gen II all situations except going across pavement and low snow base conditions.

Until you get the new T/S ski on the trail try letting the bike lean to the out side of the corner and let it ride on the center carbide and out side angle iron.

I agree your's could use more trail. I made plates for mine with standard forks when I increased the trail on the 2011 Spindle. 2012+ added material to the ears for more rotation.
 
Last edited:
H
Nov 29, 2013
20
0
1
UPDATE:
I moved the spindle to 1/8" and also got the new ski from TS.
Wow - what a difference. That did the trick. I can't believe how hard it was to ride and with those few adjustments I feel like I'm on a cloud.
Thanks to all for your advice!
 

Frostbite

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Dec 15, 2007
4,738
721
113
Eastern Washington
I just read through the Timbersled instructions and I too am a bit confused.

"For proper placement rotate the spindle until the back of the fork clamp is between flush and 1/4" to the back edge of the spindle".

The further back the ski is located, the better the trail ride quality.

The further forward the ski is located better the off trail handling.

However, wouldn't a larger gap between the fork tube and spindle move the ski forward and a smaller move the ski to the rear for a better trail ride?

How does 1/8" work compared to 1/4"?
 
Last edited:

Hawkster

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Apr 22, 2010
8,620
6,692
113
AK
Here's a mind teaser , So has the bike kit changed it's design to compensate for the lift the new ski height has on a level surface ? Compared to what the old ski had ? Are the forks readjusted in the clamps ?

Now that's getting dialed in , better get the tape measure out :face-icon-small-hap
 

Hawkster

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Apr 22, 2010
8,620
6,692
113
AK
True , what would make the difference is the approach angle of the track and since the approach angle has been changed so does the way the suspension perform . Simple things like ski pressure , floatation , loading and even how well the suspension travels . That's getting pretty darn finicky .

You know there's only two kinds of racers.... Cheaters and Loosers :face-icon-small-hap
 
S

snoman681

New member
Feb 11, 2008
88
2
8
ski set

if you put a quarter inch there on a ktm 450 exc the bottom ski bolt will be a head of the fork axel not the trailing that timbersled talks about mine jumps around on the trail or in ruts a lot in the snow its fine. I slid mine back so the clamp is even with back and i could only get about half inch of trailing
 
Premium Features