haha thats funny! I almost beleived you for a sec.
Eastwood's "It's half-time America"
- Thread starter FCR112
- Start date
haha thats funny! I almost beleived you for a sec.
During the 2008 United States Presidential Election Eastwood endorsed John McCain and in February 2012, Eastwood replied that Texas Congressman Ron Paul was "'as good as anybody else' in the race but that he will decide on a candidate in another month or two after 'listening to all that crap on television."
Hahaa this thread ended up in the right place... R U a conspiracy theorist swampy?
I'm still saying it's a badazz commercial!
Patriotic and Inspirational
Oh yeah and Clint Rules
I guess I should ask which you don't believe 1. The Boheimian grove or whether Mr. Eastwood is a current member. And no it is not a badass comercial unles you are a liberal! Swampy
F
FCR112
ACCOUNT CLOSED
Yeah it's pretty much an obvious Bohemian Grove Advertisement really. Filled with secret and overt references to a wicked liberal agenda that clearly were meant to endorse Obama's campaign
That would be sarcasm...
Here's further proof of this...
http://bottomline.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/02/10/10372843-clint-eastwood-cut-government-spending-now
And then there is this...
"I just want to say that the spin stops with you guys, and there is no spin in that ad. On this I am certain.
l am certainly not politically affiliated with Mr. Obama. It was meant to be a message about just about job growth and the spirit of America. I think all politicians will agree with it. I thought the spirit was OK.
I am not supporting any politician at this time.
Chrysler to their credit didn’t even have cars in the ad.
Anything they gave me for it went for charity.
If any Obama or any other politician wants to run with the spirit of that ad, go for it."—Clint Eastwood, to the O’Reilly Factor
It is interesting how different the perceptions of this commercial are. I am sticking with Inspirational, Motivational, and Patriotic.
That would be sarcasm...
Here's further proof of this...
http://bottomline.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/02/10/10372843-clint-eastwood-cut-government-spending-now
And then there is this...
"I just want to say that the spin stops with you guys, and there is no spin in that ad. On this I am certain.
l am certainly not politically affiliated with Mr. Obama. It was meant to be a message about just about job growth and the spirit of America. I think all politicians will agree with it. I thought the spirit was OK.
I am not supporting any politician at this time.
Chrysler to their credit didn’t even have cars in the ad.
Anything they gave me for it went for charity.
If any Obama or any other politician wants to run with the spirit of that ad, go for it."—Clint Eastwood, to the O’Reilly Factor
It is interesting how different the perceptions of this commercial are. I am sticking with Inspirational, Motivational, and Patriotic.
Last edited:
Somewhere in this I guess I missed your answer to my 2 questions. Swampy
Yeah it's pretty much an obvious Bohemian Grove Advertisement really. Filled with secret and overt references to a wicked liberal agenda that clearly were meant to endorse Obama's campaign
That would be sarcasm...
Here's further proof of this...
http://bottomline.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/02/10/10372843-clint-eastwood-cut-government-spending-now
And then there is this...
"I just want to say that the spin stops with you guys, and there is no spin in that ad. On this I am certain.
l am certainly not politically affiliated with Mr. Obama. It was meant to be a message about just about job growth and the spirit of America. I think all politicians will agree with it. I thought the spirit was OK.
I am not supporting any politician at this time.
Chrysler to their credit didn’t even have cars in the ad.
Anything they gave me for it went for charity.
If any Obama or any other politician wants to run with the spirit of that ad, go for it."—Clint Eastwood, to the O’Reilly Factor
It is interesting how different the perceptions of this commercial are. I am sticking with Inspirational, Motivational, and Patriotic.
F
FCR112
ACCOUNT CLOSED
F
FCR112
ACCOUNT CLOSED
Now this really sums it up, fricken badass
http://gawker.com/5884370/watch-snl-parody-clint-eastwoods-chrysler-super-bowl-spot
.
http://gawker.com/5884370/watch-snl-parody-clint-eastwoods-chrysler-super-bowl-spot
.
Last edited:
I need more time to get on here. So I will assume you cannot answer my question RIGHT! Or is your head to far up E$astwoods rear end to see the question? Swampy
Na you didn't miss a thing Swampy...
F
FCR112
ACCOUNT CLOSED
I agree. I appreciated the part about how many read into it thinking it was a political statement as well. Just as Eastwood said to O'Reilly, that was not the case. Damn that SNL skit was fantastic though.
I hope half the posters on this thread saw it and realized their percieved inferences may have been askew.
Swampy, you can keep trying to steer this into whatever whack job left field argument about the things it is you don't like about whomever... I'd imagine you have plenty of your own answers to your goofball questions. I was having a hard time understanding your questions, motivation, and what it has to do with this topic at all? Additionally using something close to proper spelling lends itself to credibility... Not that I'm a perfect speller, or a fart smeller, but this post was out kind of there...
"I guess I should ask which you don't believe 1. The Boheimian grove or whether Mr. Eastwood is a current member. And no it is not a badass comercial unles you are a liberal! Swampy"
Maybe reading/watching some of the links that are right in this thread may help out?
IMO It was a great ad and man that the SNL skit was outstanding!
Get off my lawn
S
skidoorulz
Well-known member
"You need to get over it"
You said that to me in one of my posts. The fact is, yes the gov bailed out GM and Chrysler. If they had not this country would be in way worse shape than it is now. Where would all the unemployed workers be working now? And I am not talking just GM and Chrysler workers. It goes way deeper than that. Chrysler has paid back the Gov loans. Some would say they borrowed money to pay back the gov. So what? It just shows that lending institutes got enough confidance to loan money to Chrysler which they would not do prior to bailout time. I myself bought a new Dodge in 2010 and own a Buick. I would never buy a Ford, they are just like Danica Patrick and JR. Overated. If GM and Chrysler would have gone away I would have been one more American buying Japanese vehicles.
So in your words Mafesto. You need to get over it!
GM & Chrysler are just like that guy down the street who went out & bought a bunch of stuff on credit & then filed bankruptcy.
Then in no time he's flying high again livin the life while the rest of us honor our word, honor our debt.
No, I think I will hold the grudge for quite some time, thank you.
Then in no time he's flying high again livin the life while the rest of us honor our word, honor our debt.
No, I think I will hold the grudge for quite some time, thank you.
^^^ X2 ^^^
I will make it easy for you since you have trouble understanding questions. Is it your position that Bohemian Grove does not exist or is it your position that Mr. Eastwood is not a frequent visitor? Or do you even know?Swampy Oh and I haven't wasted a moment watching your SNL in 30 years it's is a real example of the deprevaty this country hass sunk to!
I agree. I appreciated the part about how many read into it thinking it was a political statement as well. Just as Eastwood said to O'Reilly, that was not the case. Damn that SNL skit was fantastic though.
I hope half the posters on this thread saw it and realized their percieved inferences may have been askew.
Swampy, you can keep trying to steer this into whatever whack job left field argument about the things it is you don't like about whomever... I'd imagine you have plenty of your own answers to your goofball questions. I was having a hard time understanding your questions, motivation, and what it has to do with this topic at all? Additionally using something close to proper spelling lends itself to credibility... Not that I'm a perfect speller, or a fart smeller, but this post was out kind of there...
"I guess I should ask which you don't believe 1. The Boheimian grove or whether Mr. Eastwood is a current member. And no it is not a badass comercial unles you are a liberal! Swampy"
Maybe reading/watching some of the links that are right in this thread may help out?
IMO It was a great ad and man that the SNL skit was outstanding!
Get off my lawn
Last edited:
S
skidoorulz
Well-known member
http://www.freedomsledder.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=41656
Here is an interesting article on how the great Ford Motor Company didn't take any government laons during the problems that Chrysler and GM had. The only difference is GM's and Chrysler's loans (bailouts) that are being paid back are highly publicized and Ford's were done on the sly all the time while they were bragging about no assistance. Yep! that's the company I want to buy my next car from. If you don't like the fact that GM is giving out bonuses to the people that actually do the work and build the product that makes the company money instead of giving the bonuses to the management like has become a common practice in this country, then you are part of the problem. And no! I am not pro union, but I do believe that the person that actually makes the product or does the work that makes the company their profit, should at the very least share the bonuses. Not the managers.
Here is an interesting article on how the great Ford Motor Company didn't take any government laons during the problems that Chrysler and GM had. The only difference is GM's and Chrysler's loans (bailouts) that are being paid back are highly publicized and Ford's were done on the sly all the time while they were bragging about no assistance. Yep! that's the company I want to buy my next car from. If you don't like the fact that GM is giving out bonuses to the people that actually do the work and build the product that makes the company money instead of giving the bonuses to the management like has become a common practice in this country, then you are part of the problem. And no! I am not pro union, but I do believe that the person that actually makes the product or does the work that makes the company their profit, should at the very least share the bonuses. Not the managers.
Similar threads
