I sent out my KX500 crank to Crankworks in Pheonix to get it balanced. They had to add 135 grams to get it balanced. That's like a 1/4 pound... I haven't got to run it yet, but hopefully its nice.
But to sum up all this stuff below, if you find it easy to buy and change pistons a light Forged Wossner piston and a heavier Cast Piston then I bet one or the other will reduce your vibes to an acceptable level (betting lighter is the answer). Stock piston and pin were 484-486g. Older Wiseco 430g. The new Wiseco 871MO 410 grams. Read on...
The
power adds to the vibes. Going downhill with the motor spinning fast and no throttle there is less vibes than going the same speed at full throttle or is your bike the other way around? Your vibration may need piston weight added or removed so your engines vibrates more when you are "off" the gas being a snowbike.
As well your crank halves are not equal. Stator side is usually lighter than clutch side, so when the engines come under sudden load the crank doesn't fly out of true by inertia.
The vibration can start when a guy, adds some power (race gas anyone?) changes piston brands (not all pistons weigh the same!) and/or gets cylinder bored and has a bigger piston and then the vibes are going to increase. Crank should be balanced statically to 58% of the piston, rings, pin, bearing and the small end of the rod. There are a few youtube videos on statically balancing a single cylinder 2 stroke engine.
Here is a write up from rsss396.
A heavier piston will lower the balance factor , from what I have researched higher balance factors tend to work better for higher rpms. Truing the crank is the most important vibration reducer there is.
Fine tuning the balance factor to your chassis is the second most influential thing you can do but requires testing different % to tune out any annoying frequency to the rider.
Shops like crankworks have done some different %'s over the years using riders feed back to come up with the balance factor they use on there cranks, and the last one they did for me was about
58%
And lastly dynamic balancing does the least yet it may make some difference if the balance between the crank halves are off dramatically, but dynamically balancing is more beneficial to multi-cylinder motors
There does seam to be some differences in cranks on the cr500 but I have not gotten a chance to test all of them so maybe somebody can help with this.
I have a static balancer that I checked the balance factor of 3 cranks I had, 2 of them which have been balance by a shop came out to 56-58% balance factor.
That number is figured by taking weight and adding it to the small end of the connecting rod until the crank would hang neutral and not rotate at any position on the static balancer
That % number is of the total reciprocating mass , which is the total weight of the piston, rings, pin and the top half of the connecting rod.
When I tried to check the believed tobe 1986 crank I had the counter weight is not 180 degrees opposite the crank pin,.
The counter weight is moved slightly forward, so when the crank is set on the static balancer the connecting rod pin will be approxamately at the 1:30 postion.(no weight added to the small connecting rod like done on the balance factor test)
When I do the same on my other 2 cr500 cranks and 250r cranks they all hang with the connection rod pin at 12:00 meaning the counter weight is 180 degrees from the pin.
So if later year cranks have the counter weight positioned in a typical fashion where it is 180 degrees from the pin then just changing to one of these cranks will make a noticable differance in vibration compared to the offset style crank.
The question is how will the chassis like it? it may or may not feel better.