Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

corona virus

You Got the Shot (or not) -- Now What?
Where do the contents of the syringe end up?
Back in March I posted an article, with help from my brilliant molecular biologist friend Ronik Khachatoorian, Ph.D., making the controversial claim that some of this deltoid muscle-injected fluid -- comprised of mRNA strands within lipid nanoparticles -- ended up in the liver and other organs and tissues of the body. We speculated that after the mRNA nanoparticles entered the liver, spike proteins would be produced by liver cells, released into the bloodstream, and hence distributed widely to all parts of the body. Our claim was challenged by someone with a Ph.D. degree in immunology from Yale. He claimed that the fluid from the shot mainly stays within or near the injection site, that spike proteins are made by deltoid muscle cells, and the local lymph glands make antibodies. No spike proteins in the bloodstream and hence no serious reactions. According to him and others with similar viewpoints there was reason to celebrate: pop the champagne bottle, raise high the glass, and hail praise to "warp speed science." The claim that the fluid stays in the deltoid muscle is one promoted by experts on TV, science reporters writing in prominent national online newspapers, and doctors writing articles in medical journals. Well, it turns out that Ronik and I had it right. The first two, and fifth, comments include reports from Pfizer and Moderna that prove our claim. In animal studies the injected nanoparticles are distributed widely to organs throughout the body and a portion ends up in the liver where protein production occurs (spike proteins). To seal the deal a recently published breakthrough article proves spike proteins are present in significant quantities in the blood of recently vaccinated individuals (comment #3).
Why were we able to make such an accurate prediction way before others? Because I have been researching this topic day and night for months. I have read thousands of case reports from people describing a variety of reactions post vaccination involving practically every tissue and organ. A number of dermatological, cardiac, vascular, neurological, rheumatological, and hematological symptoms were being reported over and over again. These reactions, in such numbers, would be extremely unlikely to occur if the injected fluid stayed within the deltoid muscle. With my extensive clinical understanding, and Ronik's extraordinary knowledge of molecular biology -- he is an expert in liver function, cellular metabolism, protein synthesis, and viral reproduction -- we were able to connect the dots from the moment of the initial shot to the end results: antibody formation (good in protecting from future exposure to similar viral spike proteins), to inflammatory reactions and thrombotic events (not so good).
Now, the million dollar questions: Where else in the body do the mRNA nanoparticles end up? How many spike proteins are made and for how many days? Where do they end up once formed? How long do they stay in the body? What are the consequences of such findings now that we have a better understanding of their production and distribution? Is there such a thing as shedding or transmission? Two of my previous posts were deleted by FB so I prefer to discuss these implications on my website at www.RaySahelian com. I explain the 5 reasons why serious reactions occur (to be fair, a good number of vaccinated individuals are only having mild, temporary, flu-like symptoms). You will not find such a comprehensive and easy to read explanation anywhere else.
 
wonder if those that are concerned about vaccinations... also eat hot dogs.. read the ingredients in a hot dog..
 
Last edited:
wonder if those that are concerned abut vaccinations... also eat hot dogs.. read the ingredients in a hot dog..
I also wonder if having a mandatory "I ate a hot dog from batch number XT53IzA" will be a required item in the future to show that I "believe".
 

The ten points of the Nuremberg Code​

The ten points of the code were given in the section of the judges' verdict entitled "Permissible Medical Experiments":[6]


  1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.[13]
  2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
  3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
  4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
  5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
  6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
  7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
  8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
  9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
  10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
 
USA TODAY

Travel mask mandate to be extended into January for planes, trains, buses as COVID cases rise​


Give them an inch and they take a mile , do you really think they will give this up ?
 
Miami Herald

Visiting a national park? COVID surge means you’ll need to wear a mask again​


Where ya planning on going sledding this winter ?
 
Premium Features



Back
Top