IMO, it boils down to a rider's ability and style. If the wrong foot forward stance is your style and you can do it as easy a chewing gum, then you'll LOVE a narrower stance.
If you tend to keep both skis planted a use your body weight in a lean in hopes to make it around that ravine, you'll hate a narrower stance.
A narrow front sled will easily peel off a side hill with set up snow, unless you've got it tipped up. It's definitely more of a workout when the snow ain't fluffy.
I'm a narrow stance guy. Had a 36" on my '12 and have offset spindles on my Axys.
I would agree to some point, but honestly for me with a narrower front end, I find myself having to going into wrong foot forward less. With the narrow front end, I think a guy can use body positioning / body English / lean to get the sled to go into position. It just seems to roll and move easier or with you as you lean and move, if that makes sense?
With the wider front end, I found myself have to put more input or wrong foot forward position more often to get the sled to do what I want.
The wider stance I think is a little nicer for late season snow, marginal snow or rutted up snow. It is just more planted and and rolls across rough terrain a little better. The narrower front end is definitely nicer for average to great snow, allowing that roll from side to side with much less effort.
I've run the Alternative Impact 36" front end, the ZBroz 39, the K-mod 37 and now the new 850 is getting a full 37" Raptor front end. The other front ends also had Raptor Shocks.......which is also another benefit but is another topic as well.
Bottom line, like many others have already much stated......if you want to ride powder on one of these machines, the narrow front end does work!
Last edited: