another fine gm product

[milehighassassin]

Yes it sure will as it is the same motor as the V but not de-tuned like the V. Camaro and CTS V differnt animals but much better bang for your buck for the V and just see the faces on the young guy's face in a Camaro getting spanked by a 4000 lb four door...

There is more difference in the motor than just a de-tune. The internals are a little different as well. Same motor and specs but different pistons, rods, crank.

The price difference between the Camaro and CTS are completely different, not really a fair comparison. It would be like comparing a Challanger to a Viper.

The V is a sweet car, but the camparison is horrible.

GT-R = Ugliness

It is fast but not as fast and Nissan claimed. Porche took one and did their own testing. They used a professional Race Driver (no a Nissan test driver) and they couldn't come close to the times Nissan put up on the Ring. It is believed that Nissan used a race slick non DOT tire.

 

[INDEEP]

Is it true the gt-r is almost 80k? That's like buying a 40k Kia.

 

[catmandoo]

chatted to a guy who has one and said it was scary fast and only concern was the amount of brake dust on the wheels due to the big brakes. Here is a pic of a red one.http://manonthemove.com/2009/06/16/cadillac-cts-v-gansevoort-st-little-west-12th-nyc/

 

[skibreeze]

Could be, but Dodge did a way better job at re-creating the vintage Challenger than GM did with the Camaro.

Both nice cars though.

I agree, the challenger is a better looking retro. For the real deal, I'd take the Camaro. I have a buddy with a 68 SS convertible that is friggen sweet.

 

[catmandoo]

Would be happy with any of the said cars, and word has it the Camaro may get the caddy V engine next year. M5 has a very high price tag and that is my only concern with it....

 

[INDEEP]

OUCH. that's going to leave a scar....Would you care to put up a pink slip???

So I take it you spent the 80k??