OK, so here it is; my idea and proposal for a new plan for the mods on this site. Christopher included.
I've been thinking about this more, (that's that burning smell coming from Marysville, it's my braincells working waaay too hard) and while I am very grateful for the time and effort the mods put into this forum, I think it's time for a change. In some fashion, each section is overseen by at least one mod. This is totally appropriate. Each person that is a mod should be given a new alias, "Mod#XX". All moderator duties should be done via the "Mod#xx" alias. This would allow them to separate their personal beliefs from their moderator duties. This would be hard for some, as we have seen plenty of pissing contests develop around this topic over the years. But, in the long run, its better for the mods: They still get to retain their member alias, and they can be as opinionated as they wish, and when doing so, they don't represent or speak for the site. It's better for the site, so it avoids the confusion of a personal opinion being mistaken for an 'official site stance on a topic'
What say you?
PE
I've been thinking about this more, (that's that burning smell coming from Marysville, it's my braincells working waaay too hard) and while I am very grateful for the time and effort the mods put into this forum, I think it's time for a change. In some fashion, each section is overseen by at least one mod. This is totally appropriate. Each person that is a mod should be given a new alias, "Mod#XX". All moderator duties should be done via the "Mod#xx" alias. This would allow them to separate their personal beliefs from their moderator duties. This would be hard for some, as we have seen plenty of pissing contests develop around this topic over the years. But, in the long run, its better for the mods: They still get to retain their member alias, and they can be as opinionated as they wish, and when doing so, they don't represent or speak for the site. It's better for the site, so it avoids the confusion of a personal opinion being mistaken for an 'official site stance on a topic'
What say you?
PE