What about premixing oil in gas on a pro turbo with secondary injectors in intake manifold? That should be good, as it would lube piston skirts and crank also, right?
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What about premixing oil in gas on a pro turbo with secondary injectors in intake manifold? That should be good, as it would lube piston skirts and crank also, right?
Outside if warranty, could one "T" in a fitting to two of the existing line going to crankcase and install old school brass nozzles int the T-bodies?
what would then be best on a turbo, turning up the oilpump or run premixed oil in gas? or a mix of both?
I'm not following you exactly. All the oil being put out by the pump is already going into the crankcase. If you installed two check valves into the throttle bodies the oil you put into those check valves would still go directly into the case with the air flow.
Essentially, you would be robbing Peter to pay Peter.
Maybe i don't understand what you are asking.
Would the oil mix with incoming air, lube reeds and give more coverage of lube than just what boost port offers ?
The oil pump has a barrel valve in it and if you turn it too far you'll start closing off the oil port. So you will supply your engine with more oil at 1/2 and 3/4 throttle but at full throttle you will have less If you turn up the oil pump too far.
Not my .02, facts.
One last thing, the oil pumps that are found on at least Polaris and Arctic Cat snowmobiles do not supply a constant flow of oil. they pump like a pneumatic fuel pump. gulps of oil, not a constant flow like you'd see in a car engine. So adding oil to the gas tank bridges the gap between gulps.
I don't always hold my snowmobile throttle wide open but when I do, I would like the oil pump port to be wide open, Not closed off because I adjusted it too far.
Thats kind of my take too.
On a CFI-2 motor, Premix enters the cylinder from the boost ports when the piston is headed to BDC. A small amount of premix hits the piston at the boost ports but nowhere else on the piston. Once the piston has reached BDC the premix is in the combustion chamber area above the piston and rings. At this point the cylinders above the rings are being lubricated by the premix. As the piston travels back up on the compression cycle the premix is wiped from the cylinder walls by the rings. At no time does premix lubricate the cylinder below the transfer ports. A very small amount of premix will lubricate the piston in the area of the boost port but this is relatively insignificant.
.
Curious.... Where did you get this information?? Is this direct from Polaris?
Thanks
The fuel ~vs~ oil and lean debate is basically this, lets say the injector flows 5mm of fuel pre firing stroke, now displace some of that fuel with oil, lets say for sake of arguement, 1mm, now you are only flowing 4mm of fuel, and 1mm of oil, basically you are now introducing less fuel with the same amount of air, this equates a lean condition, enough to make a real world difference? I doubt it. As far as adding extra lubrication to the bottom end, it will not, as fuel is injected into the transfer port, as it enters the combustion chamber, so no added benefit to the bottom end, but yes to the piston and upper rings. Turning up the oil pump is the only real way to add lube to the bottom end. My $0.2
I know this has been discussed a bit, but I think the fact that there seems to be two very different views on this is interesting. Let me start the debate by raising a few questions.
First many say adding oil to the gas leans out the burn, why do you think that? Why would sled manufactures add oil to new sleds gas tanks for the initial break in period. If the oil causes a lean condition, would it be smart for a manufacturer to suggest this on a new tight engine?
Second, most two stroke engines from the very beginning have had oil in the gas, why has that worked so well for so many years? The desired gas to oil ratio is approximately the same whether the engine is injected with oil or if it’s mixed in the gas. And yes I understand that the oil injection is not direct injection, but for the sake of this discussion it shouldn’t matter.
There is also the issue of oiling the bottom end with injection systems, but that’s not what I want this thread to discuss.
What are your thoughts on whether oil added to gas leans out the burn, and if so why is that?
It's an empirical fact that oil displaces gas for any given volume of mixed fuel but I can't grasp how the presence of oil in the fuel (I'm not an engineer) would cause a lean condition. Doesn't the oil/gas ratio affect the flashpoint of the fuel? From my own, limited, non-scientific observation too much oil in the gas produces lots of smoke and fouled plugs. My assumption is more oil raises the specific gravity of the fuel and flashpoint resulting in incomplete combustion of which the smoke and fouling are common symptoms.
If you keep adding oil to the gas you will eventually get a mixture that won't ignite. I don't know what that point is chemically but that seems to be the exact opposite of a lean condition.
I defer to the fuel system experts but that's my anecdotal observation.
IMO if you are going to add "extra oil" to a tank of gas, you might as well delete the oil injection system and go to straight up premix