Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yours does but not everybody s does. They have to set that up that way.My truck and trailer insurance covers cargo.
What would typically happen is if your friend (who didn't have coverage) had insurance, his insurance would have covered the loss. That insurance provider would have then gone after the insurance provider for the trailer and recovered the loss from that provider because that provider was the insurer of the cause of the loss. However, because your friend didn't have coverage, they denied the claim and he should have engaged legal representation. Once served, the insurance company would likely have covered his loss. This is how today's insurance industry works, they refuse to pay until served legal notice. Even then, they will sometimes (higher dollar cases) take it to court because there is always a chance some extenuating circumstances could be found during the discovery process. Typically this relevant to settlements of tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars or millions of dollars, but the principal is still the same. It's easier and more profitable for the insurance company to deny the claim until forced to do so by legal means.I bet you're wrong on that. A friend had trailer come off because of pin and another buddy's sled was in there. Owner of trailer was insured but other didn't have insurance on his. It was not covered.
This has been my experience also.What would typically happen is if your friend (who didn't have coverage) had insurance, his insurance would have covered the loss. That insurance provider would have then gone after the insurance provider for the trailer and recovered the loss from that provider because that provider was the insurer of the cause of the loss. However, because your friend didn't have coverage, they denied the claim and he should have engaged legal representation. Once served, the insurance company would likely have covered his loss. This is how today's insurance industry works, they refuse to pay until served legal notice. Even then, they will sometimes (higher dollar cases) take it to court because there is always a chance some extenuating circumstances could be found during the discovery process. Typically this relevant to settlements of tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars or millions of dollars, but the principal is still the same. It's easier and more profitable for the insurance company to deny the claim until forced to do so by legal means.
I get that and assumed that's the way it would shake out if he had insurance. Most people I know don't have cargo insurance. I always insure my sleds because of theft or fire.What would typically happen is if your friend (who didn't have coverage) had insurance, his insurance would have covered the loss. That insurance provider would have then gone after the insurance provider for the trailer and recovered the loss from that provider because that provider was the insurer of the cause of the loss. However, because your friend didn't have coverage, they denied the claim and he should have engaged legal representation. Once served, the insurance company would likely have covered his loss. This is how today's insurance industry works, they refuse to pay until served legal notice. Even then, they will sometimes (higher dollar cases) take it to court because there is always a chance some extenuating circumstances could be found during the discovery process. Typically this relevant to settlements of tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars or millions of dollars, but the principal is still the same. It's easier and more profitable for the insurance company to deny the claim until forced to do so by legal means.
That's a tough one because you might have to prove it was a defect on the sled that caused it to catch fire ("how do you know the trailer didn't catch fire first?" they're going to ask). To say "you've got insurance, so we're denying your claim" is asinine. Did they even look at what's left of the sled? This kind of thing often gets hashed out between the insurer and manufacturer, but if it could be proved that a defect in the sled caused it to catch fire and burn, the manufacturer would be liable for all damages. But they're all going to lowball and/or stonewall you and hope you give up. I'm not saying to lawyer up and fight to the bitter end, but it'd be worth at least investing in a consultation with someone who specializes in insurance and/or warranty claims to see how strong a case you have. Depends on what your insurance comes back with too though. Sad how you have to fight for every little scrap in this kind of thing...Acrder: Hard to say because when I opened the man door, the whole engine compartment area was in flames to the ceiling.
Update: AC has denied a warranty claim with me. They said since it was insured it is up to may insurance company to compensate me. I asked what if I'm not satisfied with their claim offer. They basically told me we "cannot advise you on that matter". They sent me multiple "warranty case closed" emails. Really pissed, been a loyal cat guy for 22 years, raced in their race program.....
Exactly. That is why my buddy's sled wasn't covered.Had a client have an accident with his sleds and trailer, Bottom line is..If your toy/vehicle ect..ect can carry a policy on their own it's not covered...