Examples of pressure would help to clarify the explanations.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
25 pounds of air per min at 20f at 8000 feet is good for 300+ horsetorquesView attachment 362502
Yeah i was running with my EBC set to 22 lbs and on strait 110 and that map i posted is one i stole from a dude who happens to be runing the same -ish turbo on a 4 stroke Toyota truck/ supra swap. My fueling goals are to supply enough fuel for 300 hp @ around 27-30 sfm. Im running a water to air now and going to try pump gas out this season.
Your question is a loaded question. It is theoretically possible if the single pipe system is so sub optimal such that splitting the pulse improves flow. In reality, the factory engineers are good at their jobs, so the effort won't be worth it. You implicitly assume the person who builds twin pipes did it correctly for a twin scroll turbo setup. I am leaving many things out. In short, it is not worth the hassel to package all that under the hood. People would do it now if there were easy gains to be had.Yeah i was running with my EBC set to 22 lbs and on strait 110 and that map i posted is one i stole from a dude who happens to be runing the same -ish turbo on a 4 stroke Toyota truck/ supra swap. My fueling goals are to supply enough fuel for 300 hp @ around 27-30 sfm. Im running a water to air now and going to try pump gas out this season.
Xp, you obviously have a good grasp of whats going on. Would you say that in a 2 stroke , that the individual pulses could be used to better / more effectively drive a split turbine housing if A. someone could get some twin pipes built just for that purpose and B. out perform whatever the sled would have done with a stock pipe/ basic 28frame.
Daag, you follow Gale Banks? The Boost Gauge is Dead to Me! - YouTube - check out that video anyone who is interested in trying to understand. Maybe its just me but i feel like i know less the more i know! End of the day he who says he thinks he can and he who says he can't both usually get what they deserve. O.p. - Start up a build thread and i'll try and offer my opinions/ help as i can. You can build an old school turbo sled with new school tech for sure! I had one of those planned but decided my time was better spent starting with a good chassis and trying to figure out how to run it off of ONE throttle body PRE turbo.
The joke in there is that this "good" chassis has been totaled atleast twice on paper lol i can get you actual drive vs + map pressure data soon! However id caution useing the data (or anything i post for that matter) to replicate a system running Blow through. Id love to do a carb turbo sled some day and i believe you can run them off of pipe pressure like an RC ntro car but i have never seen it done in person so ??
This is the first time Ihave been on this forum in years! There is some good information on this thread and guys leading you in the correct direction. I just wanted to add that we use to have 3 points of connection on the system for boost reference. Pipe pressure, Intake pressure (between the carbs and reeds) then air box. You can tune a sled very differently off each reference point.Yeah i was running with my EBC set to 22 lbs and on strait 110 and that map i posted is one i stole from a dude who happens to be runing the same -ish turbo on a 4 stroke Toyota truck/ supra swap. My fueling goals are to supply enough fuel for 300 hp @ around 27-30 sfm. Im running a water to air now and going to try pump gas out this season.
Xp, you obviously have a good grasp of whats going on. Would you say that in a 2 stroke , that the individual pulses could be used to better / more effectively drive a split turbine housing if A. someone could get some twin pipes built just for that purpose and B. out perform whatever the sled would have done with a stock pipe/ basic 28frame.
Daag, you follow Gale Banks? The Boost Gauge is Dead to Me! - YouTube - check out that video anyone who is interested in trying to understand. Maybe its just me but i feel like i know less the more i know! End of the day he who says he thinks he can and he who says he can't both usually get what they deserve. O.p. - Start up a build thread and i'll try and offer my opinions/ help as i can. You can build an old school turbo sled with new school tech for sure! I had one of those planned but decided my time was better spent starting with a good chassis and trying to figure out how to run it off of ONE throttle body PRE turbo.
The joke in there is that this "good" chassis has been totaled atleast twice on paper lol i can get you actual drive vs + map pressure data soon! However id caution useing the data (or anything i post for that matter) to replicate a system running Blow through. Id love to do a carb turbo sled some day and i believe you can run them off of pipe pressure like an RC ntro car but i have never seen it done in person so ??
Have you, or anybody else spec'd out the size of turbo being used on the Skidoo factory turbo?Your question is a loaded question. It is theoretically possible if the single pipe system is so sub optimal such that splitting the pulse improves flow. In reality, the factory engineers are good at their jobs, so the effort won't be worth it. You implicitly assume the person who builds twin pipes did it correctly for a twin scroll turbo setup. I am leaving many things out. In short, it is not worth the hassel to package all that under the hood. People would do it now if there were easy gains to be had.
Again, you won't make 300 hp on a 2S unless your turbo is capable of efficiently generating 35 lb mass flow through the compressors and out the turbine. But, who cares what the number is. Don't fixate on that. If you like how it feels then that is all that matters. 22 psi on 110 seems unrealistic. I know guys who made 18 psi on 2S sleds, but they had to run 112 to 114 to get there. You must have really low compression. But, that is irrelevant as you pointed out. All that matters is mass flow. Guage pressure is a measure of resistance to flow.
I have not. The wheel size is not a proper factor to compare. You would need to see the compressor map to determine whether the mass flow is similar at different pressure ratios. Only skidoo has that map. Furthermore, new wheel designs often outflow older designs like that used in the 2860. Again, you need the compressor map max mass flow rate to compare them.Have you, or anybody else spec'd out the size of turbo being used on the Skidoo factory turbo?
The compressor side looks a bit smaller than a typical Garrett 2860 we've used for many years.
I'm curious if there is a similar Garrett in size? I'm guessing it would probably be in the 25xx frame size.