On April 18, 2006, the BlueRibbon Coalition, a national trail-based recreational access group, released results of a poll taken in Western Colo. showing wide opposition to further reductions in recreational access to National Forests. The survey of 500 registered voters was conducted in eight counties surrounding the Grand Mesa, Uncompaghre and Gunnison National Forests and shows that 3/4 of the voters reject Forest Service changes that could limit public access. A clear majority favor encouraging access instead of increased limits in the form of new roadless or Wilderness areas.
73% of local residents say the Forest Service should not reduce public access on local National Forests. 58% say they strongly feel this way. Opposition is strong across the political spectrum as well, with 65% of Democrats, 76% of Independents and 74% of Republicans oppose increases in roadless and Wilderness areas. 81% of hunters and 76% of anglers are oppsed. 78% oppose reducing access among those who have seen a lot of info on the issue as compared to 69% in opposition among those who have seen little to nothing. 52% of self-described environmentalists oppose the changes.
62% of voters are opposed to the Clinton era "Roadless rule" if it means the loss of good-paying jobs. According to a recent Economic Impact Study, the Off-Highway Vehicle industry is worth nearly half a billion dollars to Colo. Access to these National Forests is important to the local economy, as are the Forests important to it themselves.
To get more poll results go to:
www.sharetrails.org/uploads/PL/GMUG/GMUG%20Survey%20Key%20Findings.pdf