K
Curious how the ZRP spindles compare to the newly released Ice Age spindles.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes. I did that before I ever rode the sled.Previous to more air in the front track shock, did you let the limiter out one hole?
Bringing this subject up again. Is there anyone with more feedback on ZRP vs Iceage or even Backwoods spindles on g4 and g5 sleds?
The only difference is the ski bolt position, Both are pulling it back towards the lower ball joint, ZRP is a little more so being setup exactly like a Polaris spindle, Iceage is an in between that and Skidoo.Bringing this subject up again. Is there anyone with more feedback on ZRP vs Iceage or even Backwoods spindles on g4 and g5 sleds?
Ya that!I've had an opportunity to ride several different iterations of taller spindles. I'm a big fan of the concept. Get's the chassis up out of the snow and allows the sled to be much more nimble/responsive.
The biggest differences when comparing are height and ski pivot location. The ZRP and Backwoods spindles are 1.25 inches taller than stock and the IceAge Elevate spindle is 1.00 inch. Simply adding a taller spindle will make your sled feel ski-heavy (or planted) in the front. You need to be able to tune the rest of your suspension to match that added height. You can add preload to the front track shock / let the limiter out, like DriveBye mentioned above, but 1 inch of height seems to be the max you can compensate for without relocating the front torque arm. Although I like the added height on a crazy steep sidehill, the 1.25" increase is too much for me in every other situation. The sled just doesn't feel balanced. 1 inch seems to be the sweet spot.
The ski pivot drastically changes how the front end responds to input. The doo's have what I've always called "Auto Steer". They like to follow ruts in the trail or knife-in and go uphill unexpectedly when sidehilling. There just a little "busy" on edge. The G5 is better due to its 34" front end. The advantage of the stock pivot location is that they have very light steering. Moving the ski pivot back towards inline (like the Polaris) makes the sled more predictable, but it also increases the steering effort. In my opinion, the Elevate spindle is a better balance of control and steering effort.
I feel like a factory height spindle with the ski pivot point moved back would be ideal. Seems like lots of mixed feelings on increasing front ride height... why not just fix the wacky steering?