It's not always a straight questions of "was it making money". It's more a question of Return on Investment (ROI). Yeti might have netted a fair amount of profit, but the questions is always would the annual budgeted spend make more money if invested elsewhere within the parent company. And, like you suggested, economic outlook would be considered as well. If the parent ship has to cut the overall corporate spend in an effort to increase working capital, they will look to identify areas of the lowest annual ROI and those are the areas they will pull the plug. That is why I suggested a smaller company could take over Yeti and potentially earn a very reasonable return and be happy with that return. But we don't know the numbers. I'm hoping C3 or others are at least inquiring and due diligence reviews are in the works, which would give them access to the numbers. But again, tough time economically to take that on. Smartest business move might be get the agreement in place, but not immediately go into Yeti kit production and have Camso support parts for a year or two before starting kit production back up. The risk, of a break in production for a couple years, may be it being harder for them to regain market share, and trust, later.