The track doesn't look like an issue to me, not a deal breaker.
If you read the posts closely you will understand why a compression test is worthless. You have a guy with 118-120 compression but 10% and 4% leakdown. At 10% those rings are shot, 4% is just right but the compression test would lead you to believe it is all good.
I agree with the notion that they need 2-4 hours to do a leakdown test is bogus. Compression test should take 15 minutes, leakdown maybe 30...
I do completely agree with the techs opinion on the durability of Polaris motors. Yes, it could need a top end now, it will definitely need one after another season. That is why getting a leakdown on a Polaris is critical. They do a poor job on the consistency of cylinder finish so they are the least consistent runners. Leakdown will tell you where you are at in the rebuild continuum.
Keep in mind the source here, this is the Polaris Pro forum and you are going to get the fan boys. You will find the Polaris guys the most vehement defenders of their brand. Great riding machines but far and away the most expensive to maintain because they are simply the least durable of the three brands by a measurable amount.
Could this sled become a money pit? Sure could... The whole sport is a money pit, wait till you go out to buy gear to keep you warm and dry, there goes another $1500...