I can one up that. I made ski dampers from 70 durometer to 100+ durometer, as hard as a hendrickson semi truck rubber block rear suspension, where i had to use a rasp to shave the damper to fit in my ski. My ski would bend, it would not swivel. So, I went from material as soft a food grade urethane drink ice tray to semi truck suspension rigid. And I recorded my sled with a mounted go pro and including getting my riding buddies to record sidehilling.
If a guy is pissn n moaning about the t-motion being too tippy, the first thing I would check is the ski damper condition. When your ski tips up, the vehicle dives towards the side of the tipping ski. The amount sled dives into the snow is proportion to the amount of ski action.
Balance to steer.
Then yer gonna see what a damper does to the action of the ski, helping you control balancing the sled to steer it. Especially after 2/3 of the season when there's a crust on the snow, hah, you'll see what a damper does vs so-called tippy T-motion.
- You go take a sidehill with your used worn factory damper. Then go back to the start point.
- Remove the damper so the ski has none. Lets see you try and balance the sled to steer it. Then, return back to the start.
- Install a rigid aftermarket ski damper and go take a 3rd run.
- [i did this, i wish people would take the time to try it out themselves]
To me the argument about T-motion vs rigid holds the same value as people wanting a lightweight can, but when stuck have 78 pounds of snow in their skidframe. You have 78#'s of snow in your skid and you're worried about 8 pounds of muffler that makes 2 to 7hp less than stock? Apply that "you can't or won't frame a test to prove your point" to the t-motion arguement.
View attachment 431758
Let me just say how much I LOVE YOUR DAMPERS on my T-Motion Summit.