Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

USDA Cites Wildfire Risk, Invasive Insects In Orders To Expand Logging In National Forests

christopher

Well-known member
Staff member
Lifetime Membership
Ski-Doo Klim EZ Lynk

USDA Cites Wildfire Risk, Invasive Insects In Orders To Expand Logging In National Forests​


Sunday, Apr 06, 2025 - 07:00 PM
Authored by Aldgra Fredly via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The Department of Agriculture (USDA) issued a memo on Friday allowing the use of more than 112 million acres of national forests for logging to increase timber production and reduce wildfire risk.

A crew member uses a tree processor to strip bark and branches from logs before being transported to a mill near Camptonville, Calif., Tuesday, June 6, 2023. Godofredo A. Vásquez /AP Photo
In the memo dated April 3, USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins declared these forests—making up 59 percent of national forests—to be in an emergency situation due to their high risk of wildfires and hazardous tree conditions. The memo was released on April 4.

Rollins stated that the national forests are in crisis due to “uncharacteristically severe wildfires, insect and disease outbreaks, invasive species, and other stressors.”

Those threats—combined with overgrown forests, the growing number of homes in the wildland-urban interface, and decades of rigorous fire suppression—have contributed to a “full-blown wildfire” and “forest health crisis,” according to the memo.

Healthy forests require work, and right now, we’re facing a national forest emergency,” Rollins said in a statement. “We have an abundance of timber at high risk of wildfires in our National Forests.”

The emergency designation would allow the Forest Service to expedite approval for logging activity in the designated forests, bypassing the usual processes required under national environmental laws.

The memo directs Forest Service personnel to increase timber production by 25 percent over the next four to five years, while also meeting the minimum requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act and other environmental laws.

In a letter to Forest Service regional foresters, acting associate chief Christopher French said he will direct regulatory authorities to streamline approval processes for timber production in the designated forests.

French called on regional foresters “to the maximum extent practicable, use existing and new categorical exclusions for timber stand improvement, salvage, and other site preparation activities for reforestation, consistent with applicable law.”

Environmental group Earthjustice has rejected the USDA’s emergency designation.

“This absurdly vast, and poorly justified, emergency determination aims to boost logging and reduce environmental safeguards across most national forestlands in a handout to the logging industry,” Earthjustice legislative representative Blaine Miller-McFeeley said in a statement.

Miller-McFeeley said that cutting down trees that currently serve as “important buffers against climate change” will not help to reduce the threat of wildfires, and that it could cause “significant harm” to forest ecosystems and negatively impact the outdoor recreation economy.

The memo follows President Donald Trump’s executive orders aimed at increasing domestic timber and lumber production. The first executive order directed “all affected agencies” to suspend regulations “that impose an undue burden on timber production.” The second directed the commerce secretary to investigate the national security implications of timber imports.

Trump stated that the country’s abundance of timber resources is “more than adequate” to meet domestic needs, but that “heavy-handed Federal policies have prevented full utilization of these resources” and caused it to rely on imported lumber.

“It is vital that we reverse these policies and increase domestic timber production to protect our national and economic security,” Trump stated in his order issued on March 1.

His second order states that the United States’ softwood lumber industry has the practical production capacity to meet 95 percent of its softwood consumption last year. Despite this capacity, the country has been a net importer of lumber since 2016, it stated.

The Forest Service has sold about 3 billion board feet of timber annually for the past decade. Timber sales peaked several decades ago at about 12 billion board feet amid widespread clear-cutting of forests.

Volumes dropped sharply in the 1980s and 1990s as environmental protections were tightened and more areas were put off limits to logging. Most timber is harvested from private lands.

Steven Kovac and The Associated Press contributed to this report.
 
I see two sides to it.
1) The forest management side in respect to forest health and fire mitigation took a nosedive in the 90's under Clinton. This could be improved on. This does not guarantee a fire resistant forest but it would help thin out the weaker trees and keep the road systems intact for fire suppression uses.
2) When was the last time you went to the lumber yard and they were out of lumber? Supply and Demand has been met with minimal Federal timber, State and then private lands. If there is a glut of excess logs entering the market to be milled that will drive prices down destabilizing the current wood manufacturing locations.

I am in this sector so I may be a bit biased. Given that the company I work for exports wood, we cannot purchase federal timber to backfill our needs for domestic uses. This is often the case for many other larger companies so the manufacturing of federal timber would either be handled by small companies that don't export or new start ups. I don't see too many willing to invest in starting a mill or purchasing a well used one to handle federal timber. Labor is another issue that affects all businesses but especially the timber industry. Mechanical equipment has come a long way to get guys off the ground but still a long way to go. The Feds have also decimated their orchard and nursery capabilities to reforest after logging, so I would imagine they would be targeting shelterwood or seed tree cuts so they can rely on natural regeneration despite hamstringing themselves without the use of herbicides to ensure a fair fight for new seedlings against competing vegetation. I won't go into the state of the current USDA employees.
 
I see two sides to it.
1) The forest management side in respect to forest health and fire mitigation took a nosedive in the 90's under Clinton. This could be improved on. This does not guarantee a fire resistant forest but it would help thin out the weaker trees and keep the road systems intact for fire suppression uses.
2) When was the last time you went to the lumber yard and they were out of lumber? Supply and Demand has been met with minimal Federal timber, State and then private lands. If there is a glut of excess logs entering the market to be milled that will drive prices down destabilizing the current wood manufacturing locations.

I am in this sector so I may be a bit biased. Given that the company I work for exports wood, we cannot purchase federal timber to backfill our needs for domestic uses. This is often the case for many other larger companies so the manufacturing of federal timber would either be handled by small companies that don't export or new start ups. I don't see too many willing to invest in starting a mill or purchasing a well used one to handle federal timber. Labor is another issue that affects all businesses but especially the timber industry. Mechanical equipment has come a long way to get guys off the ground but still a long way to go. The Feds have also decimated their orchard and nursery capabilities to reforest after logging, so I would imagine they would be targeting shelterwood or seed tree cuts so they can rely on natural regeneration despite hamstringing themselves without the use of herbicides to ensure a fair fight for new seedlings against competing vegetation. I won't go into the state of the current USDA employees.
The Yellowstone National Park fire will not soon recede from my memory.
That was the absolute EPITOME of Mis_management of forests in the USA.

As for Supply & Demand.
We have supply, but I sure wouldn't mind seeing the cost of lumber products come down from domestic production taking off once again.
 
Maybe I'm wrong, but I was under the impression that the US imports a lot of lumber from Canada. If tariffs hold on that, it could reduce supply coming in, prices go up, and it would make the lumber industry more profitable down here to get going again, US supply catches up, prices level back out.

Net result is cleaning up some of our forests without being on the government dime and producing our own lumber again.

One thing that will be for sure is plenty of legal challenges from conservation groups. That will hold any meaningful progress up for a couple years at least.
 
One thing that will be for sure is plenty of legal challenges from conservation groups. That will hold any meaningful progress up for a couple years at least.
Presidential designation of a NATIONAL EMERGENCY gives Trump all manner of room to maneuver around them!
 
Premium Features



Back
Top