Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Thoughts on the Peak track??

I like mine. Always seems to have great traction. Only time i get stuck anymore is when i screw up. Very durable. 2000ish miles on track and no misssing lugs. Track is heavy and requires alot of power to turn. I dont think i would run one without a turbo. That being said the only other track i would consider will be a 3" CE
 
Last edited:
I'm pulling mine off this week. I liked my stock track better on my turbo last year. Maybe its just the snow I've been in but it trenches more for me. The track has about 550-600 miles on it so it should be broke in by now. It could just be the snow I'm in but I'm going to give the stock track a try again then go from there. This is a 155 btw.
 
I am running a 163 on my hm turbo. Thoughts? ran it on my sled last year on my stock pro and absolutely hated it, did nothing but trench and seemed to lose speed fast in soft snow-800 miles. Been running it on my turbo for about 400ish miles this year and it seems to have softened up and the lugs are all starting to rip and it still seems to trench like a powersaw in the snow. going to swap it out for a 3 inch challenger extreme. not happy with the track at all, granted it does hook up very well in set up snow
 
ran it on my turbo pro last year and absolutely hated it in powder conditions, she was a trencher for sure, but was awesome in spring set up snow. I put on the challenger extreme 2.5 this year and i think it is probly the best all around track for a turbo pro.
 
Didn't work well when I rode with one. We had an 800 with boondocker pgt and peak 155. My dad had his bone stock 2013 800 163". On open climbs the turbo track speed made it seem faster, but boondocking I felt the stock 163 was better. Also in the shade where powder was drier the stocker felt like it could summit the hill with less effort. Based on my experience and the snow I rode in I would not get a peak.
 
Wasn't on a Pro, but it seemed to trench more than Camo extreme 2.5 and we saw durability issues. This was the first year they were available. Does anyone know if they have changed the construction or durometer?
 
They have a more plyable one for this year. Supposed to work better in the powder. I think they have it or the stiffer version.
 
Premium Features



Back
Top