Fixed it.
10 gal would be better tho.
the vid RMR posted was a pull start I noticed, which would be good if they have a non ES option.
This for real
- Thread starter ullose272
- Start date
10 gal would be better tho.
the vid RMR posted was a pull start I noticed, which would be good if they have a non ES option.
I thought I read earlier it was 10. something...that's what I get for relying on my memory!
I'm pretty sure the documentation said 11.7 gallons.
And yes, a non-electric start version would be really nice for those of us who are really concerned with weight.
I understand that most all sleds are balanced heavy to the left. It just seems that this sled will be even farther in that direction than most.
I still think there's a lot of potential. I was pretty pumped to see actual video of some actual prototypes. For a while there, some of the info they were giving us seemed so garbled and self-contradictory that it had me thinking "Wait, they've still only even built this thing on a computer!!"
And yes, a non-electric start version would be really nice for those of us who are really concerned with weight.
I understand that most all sleds are balanced heavy to the left. It just seems that this sled will be even farther in that direction than most.
I still think there's a lot of potential. I was pretty pumped to see actual video of some actual prototypes. For a while there, some of the info they were giving us seemed so garbled and self-contradictory that it had me thinking "Wait, they've still only even built this thing on a computer!!"
