slp/pa pipe

[poolaris]

what you everyone recommend using??

slp pipe/pcv

or

power addiction pipe with pcv
0-3000ft

both are pretty much same in price but the hp difference is quite a bit
talked to both sides and i guess its just up to which one you believe

slp says near 8 hp

pa says 10-12hp mid and 4-5hp top end

anyone running theses, please give some feedback on your setup

also motor is stock

 

[liberty]

I'm also interested in hearing results of those 2 setups.I'm looking to buy a new 800 pro and ride 3-6000 ft. Looking for a little more power. Best bang for the buck. Currently ride a 800 dragon w/SLP pipe and silencer and have been happy with it. Am considering trying the hps can and power addiction head.

 

[pura vida]

you'll probably be happy with either. i have the slp with the PA head and a buddy has the dyno port with the PA head. we ride 0-3000+ feet. both sleds are 11s, he does have a tied secondary, but they run pretty close to each other. not a significant difference between the two. i do have to say that the slp map seems very safe. really considering the auto tune as i would be really curious to see what kind of map it built.

pv

 

[poolaris]

perfect thanks,i think i may run with the pa head also and slp pipe

did he see any difference putting the tied secondary on??

 

[caper09]

did anyone use the the pa head with stock sled? 12 hp and 14ft tq?? how correct do you think this information is?


anyone using the slp head? the dyno results of slp and power addiction head is insane in difference

slp claims like 2.4 -2.6 in mid the whole way up and then peak

and pa claims hp mid gains up to 12 hp in mid and 4.5 hp at peak

anyone no the truth about this??

hard to consider which one is accurate, im sure both produce hp gains but justs the hp numbers are so unreal and different between the 2

 

[1200psi]

did anyone use the the pa head with stock sled? 12 hp and 14ft tq?? how correct do you think this information is?


anyone using the slp head? the dyno results of slp and power addiction head is insane in difference

slp claims like 2.4 -2.6 in mid the whole way up and then peak

and pa claims hp mid gains up to 12 hp in mid and 4.5 hp at peak

anyone no the truth about this??

hard to consider which one is accurate, im sure both produce hp gains but justs the hp numbers are so unreal and different between the 2

Here is the proof to the pudding. This was a bone stock sled 2011 that I did the dyno run on. My head works great with the slp pipes . I have had many customers that use this setup. Either the dyno port or the slp I have had great results.

Brad

http://www.snowestonline.com/forum/album.php?albumid=2936&pictureid=25553


http://www.snowestonline.com/forum/album.php?albumid=2936&pictureid=25552

 

[plumbpowder]

did anyone use the the pa head with stock sled? 12 hp and 14ft tq?? how correct do you think this information is?


anyone using the slp head? the dyno results of slp and power addiction head is insane in difference

slp claims like 2.4 -2.6 in mid the whole way up and then peak

and pa claims hp mid gains up to 12 hp in mid and 4.5 hp at peak

anyone no the truth about this??

hard to consider which one is accurate, im sure both produce hp gains but justs the hp numbers are so unreal and different between the 2

Brads head is the best bang for the buck I had it on a stock sled then put the slp pipe and power commander on a few rides later and the head was the most noticeble change but real happy with the whole setup now

 

[caper09]

ok thanks guys!! going to try the pa head i think and maybe order a slp pipe little later