T
TheBreeze
Well-known member
thanks
I take no offense. I am as green as possible when it comes to turbos, and just want to know more about why so many people dislike the aero since to a newbie like me it seems like a great option due to its simplicity, and advertised response. I am not setup with a builder yet, and am still reseraching what route to go at sealevel. There is not a lot of info out there. If you are riding 8000 ft and up, it is a cut and dry issue (all of the kits seem to work). Down low, and being inexperienced greatly complicates the build! Not a lot of concrete info out there.
My experiences include 5 psi up to 23 psi on the .325, 250 and .125 vein units. from 1983 thru 2003.
the turbo is sensitive on the exhaust side, the slightest amount of rust or light dust in the system distorts the veins. In fact, its refered to as the ( your fault damage excuse when you write the check for 1200 $ .)
the airflow figures are less than advertised.
even low boost requires high turbo rpm with lower than expected airflow
Just tryin to save you some grief,, don't take it as an attack on your turbo builder.. it aint.
Your workmanship is fantastic. take your time man
Gus
I take no offense. I am as green as possible when it comes to turbos, and just want to know more about why so many people dislike the aero since to a newbie like me it seems like a great option due to its simplicity, and advertised response. I am not setup with a builder yet, and am still reseraching what route to go at sealevel. There is not a lot of info out there. If you are riding 8000 ft and up, it is a cut and dry issue (all of the kits seem to work). Down low, and being inexperienced greatly complicates the build! Not a lot of concrete info out there.