• Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

SAWS Editorial: Wilderness proposals - when will there be enough

Thought I would share our latest SAWS editorial.

http://www.snowmobile-alliance.org/...l_-_Wilderness_Proposals_-_When_is_enough.htm


45 years ago during the 88th Congress the Wilderness Act of 1964 was passed by Congress and signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson. This act then became Public Law 88-577. On the date that PL 88-577 became law, September 3, 1964, a little more than 9 million acres were designated as wilderness, which were then added to the newly created National Wilderness Preservation System (NWPS).

Over the years since this act became law, the amount of public land that has been designated as wilderness and added to the NWPS has continued to increase at a staggering rate. In the last 25 years alone (1984 – 2009), there has been an increase of approximately 20 million acres of wilderness. There is now a total of approximately 109.5 million acres designated as wilderness with no end in sight.

How many acres of public land should be set aside as wilderness?

If you listen to the extreme green crowd, we do not have nearly enough public land “designated as wilderness and protected for future generations”. Would doubling this amount to 219 million acres be enough for them? I rather doubt it.

On the other side of the wilderness argument there is the Snowmobile Alliance of Western States that believes we have set aside enough public land as wilderness and that the remaining public lands should be left open for multiple-use, making these public lands accessible to the majority of the public to enjoy for recreation. These non-wilderness designated lands would still be protected from development per existing land management regulations, but would also allow much needed forest management practices that are not allowed in designated wilderness areas.

If we take a look at the current wilderness bills that have been introduced and/or have already passed to date in the 111th Congress, there are valid reasons to be concerned. The Omnibus Public Lands Management Act to add 2.1 million acres to the NWPS was signed into law by President Barrack Obama on March 30, 2009. Below is a list of the remaining wilderness bills in Congress that have been introduced as of today.

AK
H.R. 39: Udall-Eisenhower Arctic Wilderness Act
Approximately 1,559,538 acres

AK
S. 231: A bill to designate a portion of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge as wilderness.
Approximately 1,559,538 acres

CA
H.R. 369: California Desert and Mountain Heritage Act of 2009
Approximately 190,124 acres

CO
H.R. 170: Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area and Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Area Act
Approximately 66,280 acres

CO
H.R. 3914: San Juan Mountains Wilderness Act of 2009
Approximately 55,080 acres

CO
S. 183: Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area and Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Area Act
Approximately 66,280 acres

ID
H.R. 192: Central Idaho National Forest and Public Land Management Act
Approximately 318,765 acres

MI
S. 109: Beaver Basin Wilderness Act
Approximately 11,740 acres

MT
S. 1470: Forest Jobs and Recreation Act of 2009
Approximately 677,000 acres

Multiple
H.R. 980: Northern Rockies Ecosystem Protection Act
Approximately 23 to 24 million acres

NM
H.R. 921: Sabinoso Wilderness Act of 2009
Approximately 15,995 acres

NM
S. 1689: Organ Mountains-Desert Peaks Wilderness Act
Approximately 260,000 acres

OR
H.R. 2888: Devil's Staircase Wilderness Act of 2009
Approximately 30,000 acres

OR
S. 1272: Devil's Staircase Wilderness Act of 2009
Approximately 30,000 acres

UT
H.R. 1925: America's Red Rock Wilderness Act of 2009
More than 9 million acres

UT
S. 799: America's Red Rock Wilderness Act of 2009
More than 9 million acres

WA
H.R. 1769: Alpine Lakes Wilderness Additions and Pratt and Middle Fork Snoqualmie Rivers Protection Act
Approximately 22,100 acres

WA
S. 721: Alpine Lakes Wilderness Additions and Pratt and Middle Fork Snoqualmie Rivers Protection Act
Approximately 22,100 acres

WV
H.R. 1109: Wild Monongahela Act: A National Legacy for West Virginia's Special Places
Approximately 37,771 acres

If Congress continues to pass legislation transferring ever increasing amounts of additional acres of public land into the NWPS, or the Forest Service keeps illegally closing Recommended Wilderness Areas from mechanized use, when will it finally get to the level that future generations (our children) will no longer have the same opportunity to enjoy our national forests by means of multiple forms of recreation as we have had the pleasure to enjoy in the past? That sad day seems to be coming sooner rather than later.

I strongly encourage you to contact your elected representatives in Congress and tell them that we have set aside enough public land as wilderness. Refer to some of the specific bills listed above with your concerns.

Lookup your U.S. House Representative

Lookup your U.S. Senator


Dave

Chairman, Snowmobile Alliance of Western States

Copyright © 2009 Snowmobile Alliance of Western States. All Rights Reserved.
Permission is granted to distribute this information in whole or in part, as long as Snowmobile Alliance of Western States (SAWS) is acknowledged as the source. If you are not yet a member of SAWS and you would like receive these alerts, please sign up on our web site at: http://www.snowmobile-alliance.org/
 
R
Nov 27, 2007
1,241
92
48
Newport, WA
When will there be enough? I don't know, I keep hoping the enviro crowd will someday realize that wilderness designation actually does almost zilch to protect land in any way, but I think by the time they take the blinders off it will be too late.
 
S
Nov 26, 2007
1,664
166
63
Helena, MT
The biggest kick in the ars is the FS kicking us out before it's even legally Wilderness. Can't we sue them for this? If they were doing something like this to the greenies they would be up chet creek.
It might be worth are time, money and effort to pursuing this.
 
The biggest kick in the ars is the FS kicking us out before it's even legally Wilderness. Can't we sue them for this? If they were doing something like this to the greenies they would be up chet creek.
It might be worth are time, money and effort to pursuing this.

If Congress continues to pass legislation transferring ever increasing amounts of additional acres of public land into the NWPS, or the Forest Service keeps illegally closing Recommended Wilderness Areas from mechanized use, when will it finally get to the level that future generations (our children) will no longer have the same opportunity to enjoy our national forests by means of multiple forms of recreation as we have had the pleasure to enjoy in the past? That sad day seems to be coming sooner rather than later.

SAWS definitely does believe that this is illegal!

Problem is, SAWS does not have the resources to sue over it all by ourselves. We have some funds that we would be happy to contribute if some other person or group can bank roll a lawsuit, but our total donated funds that we have in the bank might get us a month worth of part time attorneys fees if we are lucky.

At $300 plus per hour for a decent attorney (I am guessing here, but I think I am close), it would cost $48,000 minimum to have a full time attorney working 160 hours at $300 an hour. That is about double what we have received in donations in the 5 years we have been in existence.
 

fourthmeal

Administrator
Sep 11, 2008
804
1,034
93
Idaho
www.snowest.com
They're not interested in enough. They just want it all. And the attitude that 'if we just let them take a little, they'll leave us alone' is going to leave us with nothing. Governor [I mean Senator] Rische is sending an aid out to visit the Island Park region next week to spread the message of what the opposition's agenda is, and to get better information on how a closure like the proposed one for the Jefferson area near there would impact the economy of the region. His office said they've had pretty much zero input from sledders during the comment period.
 
Last edited:
W
Nov 2, 2001
3,460
279
83
Boise, Id
They're not interested in enough. They just want it all. And the attitude that 'if we just let them take a little, they'll leave us alone' is going to leave us with nothing. Governor Risch is sending an aid out to visit the Island Park region next week to spread the message of what the opposition's agenda is, and to get better information on how a closure like the proposed one for the Jefferson area near there would impact the economy of the region. His office said they've had pretty much zero input from sledders during the comment period.

Do you mean Senator Rische? The Governor is Otter. And no, I talked to them about it. Face to face. They didn't know the name of the area was Hell Roaring until I told them. They know now, and they got maps and everything. It's funny that no one from Salmon is upset about Big Holes being closed though?
 
S

suitcase

Well-known member
Nov 9, 2008
2,409
594
113
In the great part of OR.
Thanks Dave you provide alot of good infomation to us to use to aid in writeing letters to or Represinitves. Also keeping alot of people informed on what is happening on our fight to keep our public lands usefull. Thanks again!!!!!
 

fourthmeal

Administrator
Sep 11, 2008
804
1,034
93
Idaho
www.snowest.com
Do you mean Senator Rische? The Governor is Otter. And no, I talked to them about it. Face to face. They didn't know the name of the area was Hell Roaring until I told them. They know now, and they got maps and everything. It's funny that no one from Salmon is upset about Big Holes being closed though?

Yeah, Senator. Oops. Honestly, I think that too many people think that everything around Salmon is wilderness already. Not enough people know about the riding there. That's one reason the Centennials have made it this long, the word has gotten out and now it's a very popular spot, so more people respond.
 
Premium Features