Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Rupert Murdoch - newspaper hacking

he shut down the paper himself hoping it would maybe stop the looking going deeper..
he was badly wrong...this crap has happened way more then anyone knew..Murdoch could sink faster then the titanic...and he was considered unsinkable and on the verge of a multibillion dollar purchase of another outlet...very interesting stuff
 
Typical liberal agenda, if you can't win on the issues attack the messenger. There is nothing showing Murdoch himself sanctioned any of the activities. He has moved to close the paper and taken other serious actions to address the abuses. I think the sharks are going to be detoothed eventually on this one. Swampy:boxing:
 
I guess I was just hoping of more from you, than some political talk.

Just answering your post! You want more? How about the fact that Murdoch's company was on the brink of getting approval to gain 100% control of BSkyB which Murdoch created and owns 40% of allready. Unfortunately these problems have put this project on hold and there is significant evidence that the details of the scandal were actually sytematically leaked to the press on the brink of getting government approval. Interestingly,these complaints were received with the help of all-to conviently organized left-wing websites that had been set up just in case some major news broke about Murdoch's papers. Coincidence?
How about the fact that many of the recent sensational press disclosures were actually provided to the official investigators by Murdoch's own media company, which has been working closely with the police since the allegations first arose. There is much more to this story not being reported. I guess the left doesn't like Murdoch, probably because his Fox News trounces it's cable competitors by combined by a factor of 3. Is that enough? Swampy
 
Last edited:
How about the fact that many of the recent sensational press disclosures were actually provided to the official investigators by Murdoch's own media company,

ok..another question....why wouldn;t Murdoch have the disclosure info go to the public via their media first before giving it to the investigators..??..i would think it would benefit their company as they are the first and only with the story much earlier then the competition and they certainly could trust the source since they are the source...
 
So what your saying is that he was in on the actions and supported them from the start, sorry I don't accept your premis, he began acting when he became aware of the rogue activities. S:boxing:wampy


ok..another question....why wouldn;t Murdoch have the disclosure info go to the public via their media first before giving it to the investigators..??..i would think it would benefit their company as they are the first and only with the story much earlier then the competition and they certainly could trust the source since they are the source...
 
So what your saying is that he was in on the actions and supported them from the start, sorry I don't accept your premis, he began acting when he became aware of the rogue activities. S:boxing:wampy

no..i thought you were indicating that the news we were getting was from the investigators who were getting there info from Murdoch..i was surmising then that if Murdoch was getting the information before anyone else..(not implying directly that he is getting the info first because he is a participant in the activities)..then why doesn;t the possibility exist that Murdoch could make alot of money by being the first media to bring out the new headlines.

He could make money from his own problems..lol..kinda of like having your own private oilspill and pay the small deductable the getting paid the big dollars by the insurance company cleaning it up yourself..
 
Heck he may be guilty as hell or may make billions from the problem who knows. It just amazes me the way the media is salivating over tghe possibility of destroying the only conservative media mogul as if he is the crookedest one out there when they are guilty of stuff that would make this look like a teaparty. You know what scares me:
A media consciousely pushing and supporting the global warming scam.
A media that refuses to even question the legality of the man in the oval office or requiring him to present the actual diocumentation
A media that Attacks an Alaska governer with the vengance that they would not use against our worst enemies.
A media that purposfully refuses to connect muslim terrorism with attrocities unles they are actually forced to.
A media that blatently lies in its publications about former president bush.
A media that purposely puts explosives in the gas tank of trucks and shows a fantastic crash, for what reason I can't comprehend.
A media that refuses to vet the Federal Reserve, the trilateral commissiion, the CFR, the bildebergers etc.
These are just a few things that scare me. Swampy


no..i thought you were indicating that the news we were getting was from the investigators who were getting there info from Murdoch..i was surmising then that if Murdoch was getting the information before anyone else..(not implying directly that he is getting the info first because he is a participant in the activities)..then why doesn;t the possibility exist that Murdoch could make alot of money by being the first media to bring out the new headlines.

He could make money from his own problems..lol..kinda of like having your own private oilspill and pay the small deductable the getting paid the big dollars by the insurance company cleaning it up yourself..
 
Premium Features



Back
Top