RMK vs Assault track approach

[IDAHO HOT SHOT]

Today was a really busy, hectic day so..... I spent some considerable time laying on the floor of my local dealership looking at the rails on the Assault RMK to the left and the Pro RKM on the right. The rails on the Assault are tipped up more. Does anybody know why

 

[Snodawg]

On the RMK the rails are only tipped in the rear on the 163, not the 155. Don't know about the assault.

Are you talking about the approach angle or the rear?

 

[IDAHO HOT SHOT]

The approach angle is steeper on the Assault. The rail is visibly steeper. At first I just thought the taller shocks were the difference, but all 4 of us agreed they were steaper. I really want the Assault, but I dont want to give up powder performance. Obviously a track change out would be necessary.

 

[Snodawg]

They must have designed it that way because the drive shaft is farther off the ground. Is the skid mounted any farther back in the tunnel?

 

[MORSNO]

Did you do a 180 and check them again with the Assault on the right and the Pro RMK on the left? That's right it was a really busy and hectic day

 

[IDAHO HOT SHOT]

They must have designed it that way because the drive shaft is farther off the ground. Is the skid mounted any farther back in the tunnel?

I don't think so. They should be the same.