Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

RK Tech Drop in Piston Kit compared to PMS Polaris Fix Kit

tdorval

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
I just wanted to see what everyone's' thoughts are now that we have a few more options for potentially better and more reliable top ends for our Pros. I'm not saying the sleds need these, just trying to start a little discussion for people like myself that will be rebuilding for preventative reasons and are considering something other than oem.

I plan on putting a new top end in my 2011 T-Pro for next season and am just starting to weigh the options available. The two big contenders I'm interested in are the RK Tech Drop ins and the PMS polaris Fix kit.

Are there any pros or cons to these kits that should sway my decision. Will one of these work better in a Turbo application? I don't mind that the RK kit has a full head as I can't claim to be stock with a Turbo anyway so that's not a concern. Price is close enough to not worry me if one will be better suited either.

Lets get some discussion rolling and see what everyone thinks.
 
I think If you have a turbo you might want to call the shops and make sure there pistons don't change port timing to much. I know rkt drop in for zoos change port timing.
 
I'll look into it. If I remember correctly RK Tek mentioned they offered a turbo head that should work well, and when I last spoke with PMS they said their kit would work great in a turbo but I'm not positive.

Any other thoughts out there?
 
I think the head only changes compression (lowers), the pistons claim to change port timing, although I'm not sure how they do that without changing the base gasket.
 
Comparing these 2 kits is comparing an apple to an orange.. They are VERY different in their objective, approaches, and how they function..
 
Apples to oranges because, OUR kit adds a substantial amount of power and fixes an internal piston issue. Cooling in also increased via the patented head design and the engine is set to run at a different RPM..

I will not get into the other kit because it is not my place.. All I can do is tell you what our kit brings to the table and how it performs. The 2 kits are completely different.

Kelsey
 
Kelsey, I know you already have a lot of questions to answer, but how is R&D going on the 858 kit. I know I will be one of the first in line when this becomes available...
 
858 is doing well.. Thanks for askin.....still dialing in the clutching and fine tuning it.. Very fun engine and making good power.. Just making sure all is as it should be before releasing it..
 
Not a pro question but didnt want to start a whole new thread for this question. Do you have any of your kits in the cfi4 motors yet and what were the results? I know the "fix kit" with PA head has a great track record so far. Just checking other possibilities with new heads. Interested with the increased rpm design but at 0-3000ft. Reliability and longevity are a real concern for any cfi4 owner. Thanks
 
Not a pro question but didnt want to start a whole new thread for this question. Do you have any of your kits in the cfi4 motors yet and what were the results? I know the "fix kit" with PA head has a great track record so far. Just checking other possibilities with new heads. Interested with the increased rpm design but at 0-3000ft. Reliability and longevity are a real concern for any cfi4 owner. Thanks

We have not installed this kit on any CFI-4 engines.. While I am sureit would work fine on that engine as well, We have no plans on buying a Dragon to test it on.
 
Drop in kit runs 8300-8500 rpms.


Kelsey, Isn't 8500 RPM getting very close to tripping the DET light? and if so, clutching will have to be extremely spot on. Do you agree or am I missing something here? Thanks
 
Kelsey, Isn't 8500 RPM getting very close to tripping the DET light? and if so, clutching will have to be extremely spot on. Do you agree or am I missing something here? Thanks


DET light is not related to RPMS.. So, "no"

this kit runs stronger than stock at ALL RPMS!! Much stronger..

But optimum rpms with stock pipe is at 8300-8500 and has no problem getting there and holding it
 
OUR kit adds a substantial amount of power and fixes an internal piston issue. Cooling in also increased via the patented head design ..

Kelsey


How are you determining your substantial Horsepower results? Is it racing/climbing against a stock sled for comparison, and if so is there any video showing the results so we can get an idea of how much better your kit is to justify voiding a pretty good factory warranty for the additional cost of the kit. Serious question. Thanks
 
DET light is not related to RPMS.. So, "no"


Can you explain this a little better? If I have to light of weights in my sled and my RPM hit a certain number(8500 or so) it will throw a Det code on the screen and when I go and add the right weight it won't throw the code. Its a very common problem on the PRO. Mostly in the mid range. Thanks
 
Can you explain this a little better? If I have to light of weights in my sled and my RPM hit a certain number(8500 or so) it will throw a Det code on the screen and when I go and add the right weight it won't throw the code. Its a very common problem on the PRO. Mostly in the mid range. Thanks

Not sure how to have 8500 rpms at midrange.. So, I am a little confused with the question.. Midrange is 6500-7500 rpms.. If you have deto there it is not because you are running 8500 rpms.. We have actually ran this kit at 8600 with success.
 
Premium Features



Back
Top