hey guys, im looking into my first real bike. im looking into a 97 ktm sx 250. any info on this bike?
thanks
chris
thanks
chris
question for dirt bikers...97' KTM 250
- Thread starter cmantle1
- Start date
what kind of riding do you want to do? You'll hear alot of chit talk about the KTM and having no rear linkage, especially from moto boys, but the link isn't a huge deal. The suspension still works. and the hydraulic clutch from KTM is awesome, I wish yammi would build one.
What's your price range, you can get a lot newer and better bike then 97 for a good price still.
What's your price range, you can get a lot newer and better bike then 97 for a good price still.
i want to get into track riding, but ill still be riding some fast flowy trails. this bike is possible partial trade for a sled. i wouldnt like to spend more than 2200 bucks. im not a crazy moto rider, just want to get some track time in. im pretty new to bikes, so all info is greatly appreciated!
thanks alot.
but im willing to spend more if there is a big change at some point, for example around 2004/2005 rider forward sleds came out. if there is a big change like that i would pay more...
thnks
thnks
J
jim
Well-known member
97 is a decent year for those bikes...but KTM was still in the back of the pack during that era, mostly known for enduro style bikes. Their motocross bikes of that time were typically off in the suspension category (stiff) and the motors were peaky to make the power. The motors did make good power though, but it was peaky. They were also a bit odd in the handling department...but nothing anyone couldn't get used to. They are also built for the bigger guy if I remember correctly from the ergonomic point of view.
Good reliable bike though...but when something is 10 years old, it really depends how it was taken care of.
My suggestion for that era of bikes? 99 KX250...great all-around handler with good suspension (decently plush...almost too soft for hard motocross but nice for trails). Motor was very linear also...good bike. But, the KXs were a bit prone to falling apart...again, depends on who owned it. But, the fasteners were a bit cheaper...worth it IMO though. I personally wouldn't own a KTM from that era unless it was for off road and it was an EXC, etc.
Good reliable bike though...but when something is 10 years old, it really depends how it was taken care of.
My suggestion for that era of bikes? 99 KX250...great all-around handler with good suspension (decently plush...almost too soft for hard motocross but nice for trails). Motor was very linear also...good bike. But, the KXs were a bit prone to falling apart...again, depends on who owned it. But, the fasteners were a bit cheaper...worth it IMO though. I personally wouldn't own a KTM from that era unless it was for off road and it was an EXC, etc.
I really enjoy my KTM's, but Jim is exactly right with his advice.
Go to ktmtalk.com, lots of really good bike for sale there and an excellent place to ask your questions. I would go newer than 2003 on a ktm if it were me.
Go to ktmtalk.com, lots of really good bike for sale there and an excellent place to ask your questions. I would go newer than 2003 on a ktm if it were me.
ktm
every kx I've had, (3) from the late 90's-2001 eventually had crank problems, like the thrust washer flyin up into the piston, Ktm's are high maintenance, parts are expensive and harder to find.....mostly I ride yammies which are about indestructable
every kx I've had, (3) from the late 90's-2001 eventually had crank problems, like the thrust washer flyin up into the piston, Ktm's are high maintenance, parts are expensive and harder to find.....mostly I ride yammies which are about indestructable
I do agree, I have beat the chit outta my YZ and it's goign strong. But as for the KTMs, my father in law has a 200 and that thing just goes and goes.
All the guy does is change oil, clean the air filter and grease everything in the spring. And he rides hard! Also if your really looking at KTMs consider the 200. The bike is built on a 125 frame and has the weight, but the power is unreal. The bike would damn near climb a tree in 1st gear. Of course for moto the suspension isn't that hot, maybe stick in the 250.
thanks guys for all the great input. i decided against the KTM. i think im gonna wait till the summer comes and buy a 2004ish 250 four stroke. my buddy just got one that looks new for 2300 bucks....
Good call. Listen to JIM on this one, it is a subject he knows. infact before you do anything you should send him pictures and as much info as poss. he can lead you the right direction. Once he and you decide on a bike he can even help you with set up and give you some pointers on riding style, and what to do in the corners.....you'll be glad you did!