polaris 163 2.4 or camo extreme 163 2.5 ?

[hontri]

Both expensive tracks so i only want to buy one! Which in your opinion is the best for powder, going up and coming down or all around. thanks

 

[Ron]

The Polaris is the best for powder, Camo for heavy snow! The Camo weighs 12 lbs more than the Polaris.

 

[trinitypowder]

I'm putting a 15" wide 156x2.5 Extreme under my XP as we speak. Mine has every other clip removed and weighed 53 LLbees on a digital scale. I'm not sure what the 163 Extremes weigh. I know the Extremes are heavy, but I didn't think the Poo tracks were that light. 12 lbs. would be hard to swallow!

 

[Butta]

I have been told the '09 Poo 5.1 single ply 155 weighs 48 lbs, mathematically putting the 163 at 50.5 pounds. That's pretty light for a 163!! The dual layer 5.1's are about 5#'s heavier for the 155. Great tracks!

 

[wellfed777]

rons right on the tracks pol. powder snow but the camo will kill it in setup/heavy snow its also the better all around track if you ask me look at the powdermax(skidoo) very similar and they work good

trinity please keep us posted how that camo ex. works on the xp would be a cool test mix up the whole 15 vs. 16 argument