Want some feedback from people running the PA 13.6 head, full SLP pipe and Power Commander fueler. Is it worth it? Any issues? How much weight was added? Thanks
PA Head, SLP, PC-5
- Thread starter Seabass152
- Start date
slp pa
i have run this setup and went from running 10-60 at 8,000 rpm to mtx 68 with weight in them and pulling 8300
i have run this setup and went from running 10-60 at 8,000 rpm to mtx 68 with weight in them and pulling 8300
sounds like you liked the combo? Any issues?
Did you use the SLP PCV map for the pipe without fuel delivery changes when using the PA head? Or, did you use the PCV mapping for the SLP pipe/head combo? Any DET issues, and running on pump gas? Any side by side comparisons to a stock sled?
ttt
P
pura vida
Well-known member
i run this setup with the 12.5 head at sea level. it makes a siginificant improvement over stock. i added the pipe first and ran the map recommended by slp. it is a safe map, to say the least. after adding the head they recommend changing the map. i decided not to change maps and i am still on the safe side. i know slp does a huge amount of testing but i think i'm going get an autotune and see what kind of map it builds.
pv
pv
2
2012switchbackassault
New member
Is anyone running the pa head and commander with any other brand of pipe besides Slp.. I head the full Slp setup and wouldn't mind a little more sound... I want to do the pa head and everything this summer... I run at sea level any tips would be appreciated
I have a 2011 assault, pa 13.6 head,slp pipe & can pcv with 70-227 map,tied sec. with 73/59.46 helix,mtx68 weights,2.5 ce track, blue/pink primary. I have about 2000 miles on sled & 1200 miles on head, pipe, pcv combo. The only issue I have had is with with the det going off in the mid range, around 5500 to 7000 rpm along the trail.As you would be burping the throttle along the trail if you punch the gas like coming out of a corner it would set the det off. I tried setting baseline,tps, didn't make any difference, tried adding some c111 still had det issues. The engine was running so crisp and snappy & I was getting 8400 rpm setting off the rev limiter at 8000' elev. I thought I wasn't loading the engine enough. So I started loading the clutch, now I run mtx 68 with 3g in the middle hole. I have been out several times in nipple deep snow & can pull 8100 to 8200 consistently, 8250 to 8300 on the trail. Since adding the clutch weight I have had zero det issues, about 500 miles, I still run about 30% c111, with 91 pre. fuel. I also run a stock 2012 pro 600, and I ride with a variety of sleds, xp's, etec's 2011 & 2012 pros,Older modded rev's. Other than turbos none of these sleds can run with me.When I ride my pro 600, then jump on buddys pro 800, then get on my assault, I feel more increase on my assault to the stock 800, than the stock 800 to the stock 600. I think the best increase in performance is in the mid range rather than the top end. I had 2 buddy's who ride 2012 pros ride my assault and within a couple minutes they both were pitched off the sled, they would lean into a turn and punch the throttle and they were off the back of the sled,came back and said they couldn't believe the difference in grunt. This is what I like, when you are traveling in the trees or gulleys, hardly use full throttle when everyone else is maxed out. After owning this set up I would do it again, actually thinking of snow checking a 2013 and doing this set up or a RKT 858.
Couple questions d8:
-How much of a performance increase was the Tied? Worth it?
-Who's map reference # is that?
-Have you tried straight pump gas since adding clutch weight?
-What weights were in the MTX holes before the increase?
Thanks
I think the tied shifts smoother & quicker than stock,also it has less rpm drop on top end backshift usually only 50 to 100 rpm then pulls back up to full rpm. I think because it shifts smoother with less rpm drop I probably get better belt performance but probably hard to prove just my opinion.
SLP.
No, at around 15 bucks per fill to add the c111 I like how it runs.
The holes were empty, just the 68 mtx weight.
Thanks again d8
2 more things to add I thought of
- I had it in the shop a few weeks ago and check compression had 135 even both sides.
- I consistently use less fuel than other stock pros, I think its because I am using less throttle to cover the same terrain. On average day say I am breaking trail and I used 25 litres, other pros would be 28-30 litres, etec would be 22-24 litres, & 800r would use 36-40 litres.
- I had it in the shop a few weeks ago and check compression had 135 even both sides.
- I consistently use less fuel than other stock pros, I think its because I am using less throttle to cover the same terrain. On average day say I am breaking trail and I used 25 litres, other pros would be 28-30 litres, etec would be 22-24 litres, & 800r would use 36-40 litres.
D8Grandpa - what elevation do you ride at?
Thanks
Thanks
