5
550iq
Well-known member
I would seem that Polaris has pushed their "low inertia" drive system design out to the point where the line between ridiculous and common sense becomes blurred; not quite sure how far to push the window to now knowing they might have gone too far. My bet is that after a bit, Polaris will add mass back to the axle and drive belt/pulleys. Do unresolved issues keep the true believers away? Not a chance, we'll work through it and reap the rewards.
Also, everyone needs to remember that the more you define the intended use of the sled, the more fickle it will become. Racers know that about specially prepped highly tuned race sleds, and now the consumer powder riders are getting to understand it too. The modern Pro RMK is becoming more fickle as its design is more defined. Could the Pro RMK become a prima donna, diva sled? You know the Pro RMK is the greatest powder sled ever and so does it. And to think people buy the Pro for ordinary riding and minimal maintenance, how naive is that? (something the factories may not tell you as if it is understood). 550iq
Also, everyone needs to remember that the more you define the intended use of the sled, the more fickle it will become. Racers know that about specially prepped highly tuned race sleds, and now the consumer powder riders are getting to understand it too. The modern Pro RMK is becoming more fickle as its design is more defined. Could the Pro RMK become a prima donna, diva sled? You know the Pro RMK is the greatest powder sled ever and so does it. And to think people buy the Pro for ordinary riding and minimal maintenance, how naive is that? (something the factories may not tell you as if it is understood). 550iq
