• Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

OHV funds under attack!!!

colorado_matt

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Nov 26, 2007
1,533
1,252
113
COLORADO
Hey everyone, thought I'd pass this information on and hope you'll do the same. This information is from our csa president and COHVCO. Thanks, Matt


Below is an alert from COHVCO regarding a very serious dilemma for the OHV fund. This is an issue that has been playing out for a number of months beginning with the attempted raid on the OHV fund last spring. Responsible Trail America is not backing away. The resolution discussed in the alert below is similar to legislation that has Responsible Trails America pushed through in Nevada and Arizona, effectively stripping the OHV community of their funding. The resolution presented by the Southern Rockies Conservation Alliance is being pushed by Aaron Clark. Aaron is also very active in Winter Wildlands Alliance (a winter quiet use group) which is totally consumed with forcing the Forest Service to create a Winter Travel Management Rule similar to the Travel Management Rule being adopted now. The sole purpose of a Winter Travel Management Rule is to restrict over snow travel entirely to trails. So, even though this resolution is trying to grab OHV funding now, you can see that the wheels are turning so the same thing can happen to Snow funding. I know that many of you are OHV enthusiasts as well so it is imperative to speak up. I have been invited to the Parks Board meeting on November 20th to speak for snowmobiling and to support the OHV program. This is certainly one of those times that we have to stand shoulder to shoulder with our summer friends. Please get this into as many hands as you can!



**COHVCO ALERT**



YOUR COLORADO OHV PROGRAM FUNDS ARE UNDER SERIOUS ATTACK !!!!!!!



WHAT'S GOING ON HERE?



Responsible Trails American, a notorious anti-access and anti-OHV preservationist organization from the east coast has an agenda to take your Colorado OHV registration funds. They want this money because in many cases funding trail maintenance is the only thing that stands between you and extensive closures. They want over 70% of your funds to go to law enforcement and trail closures. THIS IS NOT WHAT THESE FUNDS WERE INTENDED FOR!



HOW ARE THEY TRYING TO DO THIS?



By hiring a prominent local Colorado lobbying firm (yes, the same firm that tried to raid the OHV fund last year) to lobby the Park's Board to force the use of our funds their way, which attempts to destroy the program. They have submitted a resolution to the Park's Board to adopt at the November 20, 2009 Parks Board meeting. The entire resolution misrepresents our nearly 20 year old program. It spits in your face!



HOW CAN YOU STOP THEM?



They can only be stopped by the voice of the OHV community. You must contact the Colorado State Park's Board to save your fund. If you do not, then your money will go towards the destruction of your sport!



YOU HAVE TO CONTACT THE COLORADO STATE PARKS BOARD!!

The deadline for contacting them is: November 18, 2009



While the message should be in your own words here are a few points that may assist you in writing your letter:





· I strongly object to the Resolution submitted by the Southern Rockies Conservation Alliance. This proposal is a self-serving attempt to advance their interests and should be rejected by the Board.

· The SRCA Resolution will shift funds from critical trail maintenance operations currently funded by the OHV program. Doing so will result in mandatory closures of trails that do not meet "standard."

· The program has always struck the proper balance among maintenance, education, signing and environmental protection. It is recognized as one of the best programs in the country.

· Decades ago, Colorado's OHV community voluntarily "taxed themselves" in order that federal land managers would have the resources to manage our recreation. As an OHV recreationist who pays, I will not support these fees going to advance the agenda of other groups who do not pay to manage their recreational use.

· The Southern Rockies Conservation Alliance Resolution takes facts out of context as to the current status of OHV recreation in Colorado. The facts are that once Travel Management Plans are in place compliance is increased, law enforcement is effective and impacts are reduced.

· Colorado's OHV Program is viewed by the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management as one of the best in the country. There is no need for changes to Colorado's OHV program.

· In response to concerns about unlawful OHV use, our community supported HB1069, which is designed as a highly effective enforcement tool.

· HB1069 from 2008 allows every law enforcement officer to enforce restrictions on OHV travel, more enforcement is not necessary as only a small number violate the law.

· Colorado's OHV Program was intended to provide those that pay into it with opportunities.

· People from outside Colorado should not be allowed to modify a statute to the detriment of those who pay their way.

· The Program is far different than similar programs in other states and is not in need of tying up funds for outside interests; our program is uniquely well operated.

· A recent legislative audit found that the OHV Program was in compliance with the law and very properly administrated.

· Don't hesitate to add few personal lines about how you or you and your family are responsible recreationists and love your sport.





E mail to: parksinfo@state.co.us



Address your e-mail to:



Mr. Dean Winstanley Director

And the Colorado Parks Board

Colorado State Parks

1313 Sherman Street, Suite 618
Denver, CO 80203
 

bushy

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Jan 26, 2004
4,450
985
113
Glacier View, CO
Thanks. I recall writing a letter on this issue several months ago. Can't believe there ****ed up agenda is still breathing air. It would seem that WE spoke up when WE paid OUR registration, CSA, and COHVCO dues, but no. Turns out WE'RE supporting the enemy now eh? Pretty dis-heartening to hear this disgusting twist.
 
Last edited:

arcticman31

Well-known member
Premium Member
Nov 27, 2007
288
128
43
Colorado
BS!

The Fight is on..........If we do not stick up for our sport the preservationists and extreamists will own it. Strength in numbers is the only way to save our sport and continue to give our kids and their kids a place to ride. I would strongly encourage each and every one out there to take some time out of their busy day to stick up for whats right. Its our money and our land so we cant just take a back seat and wait to see what happens...
 
B

BackCountryBob

Well-known member
Aug 7, 2001
928
158
43
Arvada, Colorado
LAST DAY TO WRITE A LETTER IS NOV 18. As of today Parks has only received 736 letter---not enough, we need more---it only took 5 minutes to get a simple letter off---DOO IT NOW:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::

BCB
 
K
Nov 29, 2007
237
41
28
Colorado
Summit Daily News: Debate continues over off-road vehicle use

Debate continues over off-road vehicle use
Growth of motorized recreation spurs funding questions
By Bob Berwyn
summit daily news,

FRISCO — Depending on who's talking, off-road vehicle use in Colorado is either part of a multi-use utopia on public lands, or a looming disaster for wildlife and other natural resources.

The Colorado State Parks board will try to sort through divergent testimony offered Friday at a hearing in Frisco as it tries to decide whether to revamp the way it allocates funds from off-highway vehicle registrations.

A coalition of conservation and outdoor user groups wants to earmark specific portions of the $3.2 million pot for restoration and law enforcement, but some regional public land administrators, along with representatives of motorized groups, advocated the status quo.

According to Glen Graham, president of the Colorado Off-Highway Vehicle coalition, the entire discussion is framed by “a subtle and sometimes not-so-subtle bias” against motorized users.

“There are problems and issues that need to be addressed. But the reality is not as bad as the perception,” he said. Broad-based, sweeping allegations against motorized users are unfounded, he added.

Nearly everyone at the hearing agreed the majority of off-road users are responsible citizens who follow the rules. The problem is a small percentage of renegade riders who willfully create illegal trails.

San Miguel County Commissioner Pete McKay acknowledged the economic importance of off-roading in his county, but asked the board to redirect some of the funds to help restore fragile alpine tundra that's been damaged by illegal off-road use.

McKay said a locally funded ranger and outreach program has helped reduce violations. More state funding for similar efforts could pay off statewide, he said.

Speaking on behalf of Colorado Trout Unlimited, Dave Peterson said enforcement and restoration efforts haven't come close to keeping pace with the growth in off-road use in recent years. As a result, hunters and anglers have taken a big hit from motorized impacts, he said.

“We are getting lost in the shuffle. We're not trying to take anything away from anyone. We're just trying to protect our piece of the pie ... There are legions of studies showing the impacts of motorized use,” he said. Directing some of the off-highway vehicle funds toward enforcement and restoration would help ensure motorized users pay their fair share of managing public resources, he said.


Economic driver
Regional U.S. Forest Service recreation director Steve Sherwood emphasized the importance of motorized recreation as an economic driver in Colorado's outdoor recreation industry, and warned against demonizing motorized users.

“We are truly moving toward sustainable motorized recreation use,” Sherwood said, outlining Forest Service planning efforts to manage trail use. “Locking in the funds would reduce the resources for maintenance. Trails would deteriorate and some would even have to be closed.”

Sherwood said he supports funding for enforcement and restoration projects, but said the board should retain the flexibility to award grants based on specific needs in local areas.

Other regional Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management officials presented similar testimony illustrating the success of collaborative management efforts.

But a recently retired Colorado Division of Wildlife official said the situation on the ground is quite different from the images in glossy Forest Service brochures.

The growth of motorized use has outstripped the ability of land managers to keep pace, said Rob Firth, formerly the chief law enforcement official with the state wildlife agency. In reality, illegal trail systems continue to expand in some areas, Firth said, making the case for more enforcement and restoration funding.

The off-highway funds are distributed under a complex points system, with each grant proposal being evaluated on a variety of criteria. Critics of the current system said it favors proposals for building and maintaining trails over funding for enforcement and restoration projects.

The U.S. Forest Service in Boulder, for example, was denied funding for a restoration project because it didn't meet the points criteria. The proposal didn't include trail building or maintenance, so the review committee turned down the project, according to Aaron Clark, recreation director with the Southern Rockies Conservation Alliance.

The state parks board didn't make a decision Friday, but asked for more information, including statistics on violations of off-road rules.
 
Premium Features