Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Obama's stance on gun control-READ THIS!!

M

mtn_extreme

Well-known member
Copy and pass on to all you can if you believe in your right to bear arms!!!

_______________________


October 10, 2008 Fellow Sportsman, Hello, my name is Rich Pearson and I have been active in the firearm rights movement for over 40 years. For the past 15 years, I have served in the Illinois state capitol as the chief lobbyist for the Illinois State Rifle Association. I lobbied Barack Obama extensively while he was an Illinois State Senator. As a result of that experience, I know Obama’s attitudes toward guns and gun owners better than anyone. The truth be told, in all my years in the Capitol I have never met a legislator who harbors more contempt for the law-abiding firearm owner than Barack Obama.Although Obama claims to be an advocate for the 2nd Amendment, his voting record in the Illinois Senate paints a very different picture. While a state senator, Obama voted for a bill that would ban nearly every hunting rifle, shotgun and target rifle owned by Illinois citizens. That same bill would authorize the state police to raid homes of gun owners and forcibly confiscate banned guns. Obama supported a bill that would shut down law-abiding firearm manufacturers including Springfield Armory, Armalite, Rock River Arms and Les Baer. Obama also voted for a bill that would prohibit law-abiding citizens from purchasing more than one gun per month.Without a doubt, Barack Obama has proven himself to be an enemy of the law abiding firearm owner. At the same time, Obama has proven himself to be a friend to the hardened criminal. While a state senator, Obama voted 4 times against legislation that would allow a homeowner to use a firearm in defense of home and family.Does Barack Obama still sound to you like a “friend” of the law-abiding gun owner? And speaking of friends, you can always tell a person by the company they keep. Obama counts among his friends the Rev. Michael Pfleger - a renegade Chicago priest who has openly called for the murder of gun shop owners and pro-gun legislators. Then there is his buddy Richard Daley, the mayor of Chicago who has declared that if it were up to him, nobody would be allowed to own a gun. And let’s not forget Obama’s pal George Soros - the guy who has pumped millions of dollars into the UN’s international effort to disarm law-abiding citizens.Obama has shown that he is more than willing to use other people’s money to fund his campaign to take your guns away from you. While a board member of the leftist Joyce Foundation, Barack Obama wrote checks for tens of millions of dollars to extremist gun control organizations such as the Illinois Council Against Handgun Violence and the Violence Policy Center.Does Barack Obama still sound to you like a “friend” of the law-abiding gun owner?By now, I’m sure that many of you have received mailings from an organization called “American Hunters and Shooters Association(AHSA)” talking about what a swell fellow Obama is and how he honors the 2nd Amendment and how you will never have to worry about Obama coming to take your guns. Let me make it perfectly clear - everything the AHSA says about Obama is pure hogwash. The AHSA is headed by a group of left-wing elitists who subscribe to the British view of hunting and shooting. That is, a state of affairs where hunting and shooting are reserved for the wealthy upper-crust who can afford guided hunts on exclusive private reserves. The AHSA is not your friend, never will be.In closing, I’d like to remind you that I’m a guy who has actually gone nose to nose with Obama on gun rights issues. The Obama I know cannot even begin to identify with this nation’s outdoor traditions. The Obama I know sees you, the law abiding gun owner, as nothing but a low-class lummox who is easily swayed by the flash of a smile and a ration of rosy rhetoric. The Obama I know is a stony-faced liar who has honed his skill at getting what he wants - so long as people are willing to give it to him.That’s the Barack Obama I know. Sincerely,(original signed) Richard A. Pearson Executive DirectorIllinois State Rifle Association 420 E. Locust, P.O. Box 637, Chatsworth, IL 60921Phone: (815) 635-3198 or (815) 635-3166 Fax: (815) 635-3723 Website: www..isra.org
 
Thanks for the post. Unfortunately, most people (especially gun owners who support Obama) think that the Dems would never take away their guns. Obama's record tells a different story.
I'm still "clinging to my religion and guns".
 
unbelieveable, Thanks for posting. This guy seems to be against EVERYTHING this country was founded on.
 
That totally confirms my gut feeling after I saw the commercial about him supporting the 2nd Amendment. What a POS! I would never enforce that agenda as an officer...I would tell them to go **** themselves...hand them my badge and join the militia!
 
Ha, Looks like someone beat me to it.

Rich was on NRA News last night and I was taking notes while driving. It's sickening to hear people say that he's not anti-gun and the like but when you look at his record it proves that he is. Then 3 debates with multiple occurrences of the same questions and same answers and the second amendment wasn't mentioned once. :rolleyes:
 
I just want to know why McCain didn't press this issue at the debates. Seems like he could easily have made this another "issue". Does McCain realize if he looses, we get a socialist?
 
His stance:
http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/issues/additional/Obama_FactSheet_Western_Sportsmen.pdf

Fact check:
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/nra_targets_obama.html

I don't like some of his policies, but he is not as bad as the NRA has made him out to be. I don't like his idea to ban concealed weapon permits, and I don't like the assault rifle ban.

He does support hunters and the right to own (most) weapons.

I honestly do not think guns are going to become an issue. Why? Because this country has WAY more important things happening than guns. I think it would be political suicide for either candidate to take gun control up as a pressing issue. If they did, the other guy would just have to mention how this country's economy is in the tank and X-candidate only cares about guns (or cares about banning guns). It won't happen.
 
Another Source PolitiFact

My advice to Obama would be to quite letting others fill out his campaign questionnaires. It seems he's blamed errors on two campaign questionnaires, by campaign aides. Even though his own handwriting was on one. That's just two covenant.

My stance is that Obama will not come out against guns openly. He will support any bill that limits them. Metal jacketed rounds. Armour piercing (which every rifle is capable of), Mean looking guns. Any and all hoops to jump through for gun ownership. Gun shows. Capacity clips. And, of course automatic guns.

Obama has a written record opposing guns. The NRA is right to be concerned.

Personally, I'm going to shop around for gun design plans. I can make my own, if he time comes.

FYI. there's a lot of questions being raised about factcheck's facts.
 
Last edited:
why we have guns

and this is the reason we have guns. and this is the people Nobama has made alliances with.:eek::eek:


American Genocide

Communists killed over 100 million of their own people in the course of the 20th Century (as horrifyingly documented here). But even though we have communists here in the USA, we'll never have genocide, because our democratic safeguards would stop evil people from getting that much power, right?

Via Stop the ACLU, here's video of Larry Grathwol, who joined the Weather Underground as a undercover law enforcement agent:

I brought up the subject of what's going to happen after we take over the government. We become responsible then for administrating 250 million people … and there was no answers. No one had given any thought to economics. How are you going to clothe and feed these people? The only thing that I could get was that they expected that the Cubans, and the North Vietnamese and the Chinese and the Russians would all want to occupy different portions of the United States. They also believed that their immediate responsibility would be to protect against what they called the counter-revolution. They felt that this counter-revolution could best be guarded against by creating and establishing re-education centers in the Southwest, where we would take all of the people who needed to be re-educated into the new way of thinking and teach them how things were going to be. I asked, well what is going to happen to those people that we can't re-educate that are die-hard capitalists? The reply was that they would have to be eliminated. When I pursued this further they estimated that they would have to eliminate 25 million people in these re-education centers. When I say eliminate, I mean kill … 25 million people.

I want you to imagine sitting in a room with 25 people, most of which have graduate degrees from Columbia and other well-known educational centers, and hear them figuring out the logistics for the elimination of 25 million people. And they were dead serious.

The Weather Underground was headed by Bill Ayers, who went on to groom Barack Obama for office, even launching BHO's political career from the home he shares with fellow communist terrorist Bernardine Dohrn.

Nothing is so awful that it couldn't happen if the cesspool that produced Barack Obama takes over our government.
cambodia-killing-fields.jpg
The Left brought Change to Cambodia.

Cross-posted at Moonbattery.

sorry the links didnt come throuh.
 
Last edited:
Got Handbag ????

and then guys are bewildered when I show them US concentration camps being built right now ..go figure ..you boys are gonna be in for one hell of a ride ..............................
 
Premium Features



Back
Top