Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Obama's godlike status is about to burst

I have a question.
I have been re-reading some of the posts on Obama and have a question.
Why does it seem that the Obama followers never provide any evidence to back up their statements, but the McCain believers have to give truck loads??

How did you get that? Look at Cmantle, milehigh.. and my posts.. most of the time we have links and quotes and all sorts of stuff.... The McCain believes post links to blogs or youtube videos and expect that to be taken as evidence... A fricken youtube video evidence? Yah, they sure have the same quality standards as newspapers and other professional publications.. Wait, youtube was no standards at all, as long as it is not infringing on copyright law.

Ayers has NEVER denounced his past. He still thinks what he did was right. Obama surrounds himself with people that hate this country.

Ayers, his paster, just to name 2.
So answer me this.
What EXACTLY makes you think Obama's friends are reformed?

I don't care what Obama's friends think... Just the fact that Obama has denounced him and is against what he did. I care what Obama thinks.... Oh, and friend? I think they worked on a board together.....

And, still, why would you surround yourself with people that are "reformed"?
What EXACTLY has Obama done that makes you think he is anything other than a socialist?

You are not using the definition of socialist correctly.... We are not in a pure capitalist society, right? So we are over to the left of capitalism towards socialism... From what I gather from his message, all he wants to do is make the system that we are in more efficient and move a little more to the left... That is VERY different from a true socialist! There are many aspects of this county that are socialistic in nature... that is because pure capitalism does not work... period

He wants to force the rich into poverty.

That is not what he wants to do... He is only going to change the taxes to that of before the tax break from Bush? Funny how less then 10% change (increase) in taxes makes you a socialist

He wants to redistribute the wealth to the people that do nothing.

BS... he wants to ease the burden on the working class... you know, the ones that do all the work in this county... the ones that break there back every day just so they can give their children a better life....

He is a major player in the leadup to the calapse of the economy.

That is complete BS and shows you know very little about what happened to the economy..... The amount of loans due to the drc? efforts that have been defaulted is small... and actually since those banks that were giving the loans were much heavier regulated, the large problem did not come from there.

He thinks the military should retreat from Iraq and do nothing in Afganistan (that is unless anyone can "prove" where Bin Laden is, then he wants to invade Pakistan).

Wrong again... he wants to FOCUS on Afghanistan... that was the whole point in the first place...right... the point of the war... to get the terrorist? Don't extrapolate his plans on Iraq to his plans in Afghanistan

He wants to let the bush tax cuts expire which WILL raise the taxes on everyone (the bush tax cuts were across the board, so letting them expire will raise the taxes across the board).

Again, his plan is only to let them expire for those that make more then 250K.... not everyone

He will put the global warming crowd front and center in the EPA.

I don't believe in the global warming hooplah, but I am for the green energy movement and for investing heavily into green technologies and see that as a MAJOR opportunity for the US to become a global player in a new market. Also give people jobs..... tons of jobs...

Now, tell me.
Why the heck would I vote for him?

Based on the misinformation that you have given, there is no reason that you should... but if you look at his policies... it is a very different picture then what you are describing...

Don't give me "I think" or "I feel" or "I hate bush".
Give me reasons, give me evidence.

My comments in bold... enough for you? I can give you a crap load of links to Obama's page for all the info about his policies and such if needed.... but then you would just tell me that those are all lies..:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
My comments in bold... enough for you? I can give you a crap load of links to Obama's page for all the info about his policies and such if needed.... but then you would just tell me that those are all lies..:rolleyes:

Did you even bother to look up any of the couple dozen links provided in the video??

Obama didn't Denounce anyone. What moron thinks a man goes to a minister for 21 YEARS and suddenly realizes he disagrees with him. The minister became political suicide, so he dumped him.

Make the system more efficient?? Oh, I see. He wants to make socialism the accepted way of life.

He doesn't want to hit the rich?? Yea right. Hold on to your cash. Are you old enough to remember the 70's when the rich got slammed the last time?? It was called a recession. When the rich get hit, the poor get laid off.

Heavily regulated?? How is that possible since they were de-regulated??
Ever hear of ACORN?? Ya know, the organization that Obama worked for that forced the banks to make more toxic loans in the name of "fairness". Another step towards socialism. Then Clinton forced Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac to buy up those toxic loans, that then freed up the banks to make all the loans they wanted and make a fortune in the process?? I know EXACTLY what caused this and how far back it goes. IT started way before Obama, he just helped it along once he hooked up with acorn. Oh, and a side note, McCain was the one that tried to stop the mess and was stopped by the dems. LOOK IT UP!

as for his tax plan. I suggest you do a little homework. In order to do what he wants, he would have to increase the taxes on everyone making more than 42,000 a year. Go to the General Accounting Office research office and LOOK IT UP.

As for the global green market. Again, if done right, you would be correct. However, if you like Al Gore and all he stands for, you will REALLY love Obama. You can kiss your riding goodbye. Forget oil, Obama has already stated he doesn't want drilling. He thinks conservation will work to make up the difference. i guess when you outlaw driving that would work.

Policies?
WHAT POLICIES?? ALL HE HAS IS A BUNCH OF PROMISES WITH ZERO SUBSTANCE. WHAT HAS HE DONE?? HAVE YOU LOOKED AT HIS RECORD.
Oh wait, HE HAS NO RECORD.
I can tell you how great I am, I will save the world, make your childeren smarter, increase your lifespan to 2000 years.
VOTE FOR ME

IT'S JUST WORDS.
The man scares the chit outta me and anyone that believes all the BS he spews hasn't even really looked past all the glitz and glitter.

Tell me what he has done?
Show me his voting record.
Show me how he will do all the chit he has promised.
Explain to my poor uneducated self how he is going to keep my riding areas open.
Look up his vice presidents voting record and you will see what will happen.

Oh, and he says he wants to focus on Afganistan. Have you seen anything on what his plans are for Iraq?? You remember that, that would be the place he said we couldn't win in and should run for it while we can.

again.
Don't give me "I think" or "I feel" or "I hate bush".
 
My comments in bold... enough for you? I can give you a crap load of links to Obama's page for all the info about his policies and such if needed.... but then you would just tell me that those are all lies..:rolleyes:

Links to his page?!?!
Do you honestly think the man is going to put up a link that states he is full of chit and your a moron for believing him??

All the links I have put up are news reports, articles and links to FACTS.
The only thing he has is WORDS.
 
Links to his page?!?!
Do you honestly think the man is going to put up a link that states he is full of chit and your a moron for believing him??

All the links I have put up are news reports, articles and links to FACTS.
The only thing he has is WORDS.

Good point... though if we are talking about what Obama WOULD DO if he became president, then both our arguments are worthless....
 
Did you even bother to look up any of the couple dozen links provided in the video??

Obama didn't Denounce anyone. What moron thinks a man goes to a minister for 21 YEARS and suddenly realizes he disagrees with him. The minister became political suicide, so he dumped him.

We were talking about Ayers?

Obama Weatherman connection

Note that he worked for Daley... the big bad political machine.... Does this mean Daley is a terrorist too?:rolleyes:

On the Wright issue, Obama has said that he doesn't agree with his statements and did Denounce him

Obama - Wright Denunciation

I would be curious to know what percentage of Wrights sermans were crazy.... I would say about 5 percent.. but honestly I have no clue I see Wright as a man who started taking advantage of the limelight that Obama was in to push his own agenda..


Make the system more efficient?? Oh, I see. He wants to make socialism the accepted way of life.

Efficient was my word, and used poorly too.. Again, this is not socialism... How does not keeping the tax cuts Bush instated mean socialism? Does that mean we were a socialist country when Clinton was in office.... Yah, feel free to say yes....

He doesn't want to hit the rich?? Yea right. Hold on to your cash. Are you old enough to remember the 70's when the rich got slammed the last time?? It was called a recession. When the rich get hit, the poor get laid off.

What do you mean hit the rich? He, and I tend to agree with this, that the very rich should be paying more in taxes. Drop the feel good argument about not fair... there is much to go into on this particular subject, but most of the gains in the last 10 years have been in the rich class.. the middle class are actually making less money then they were a few years ago. So who benefited the most? The people at the top that is who. The honest working Americans have not benefited, and as shown with the bailout, we are taking a hit again..

Heavily regulated?? How is that possible since they were de-regulated??
Ever hear of ACORN?? Ya know, the organization that Obama worked for that forced the banks to make more toxic loans in the name of "fairness". Another step towards socialism. Then Clinton forced Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac to buy up those toxic loans, that then freed up the banks to make all the loans they wanted and make a fortune in the process?? I know EXACTLY what caused this and how far back it goes. IT started way before Obama, he just helped it along once he hooked up with acorn. Oh, and a side note, McCain was the one that tried to stop the mess and was stopped by the dems. LOOK IT UP!

So did Obama..... Obama letter

Interesting article about loans and minorities...

I have an article from someone at work, that they got from their CEO.. it stated that the rule that changed in 2003 that had a bid impact on this whole mess.


as for his tax plan. I suggest you do a little homework. In order to do what he wants, he would have to increase the taxes on everyone making more than 42,000 a year. Go to the General Accounting Office research office and LOOK IT UP.

There is no General Accounting Office research office :confused:

Is this where you meant?


As for the global green market. Again, if done right, you would be correct. However, if you like Al Gore and all he stands for, you will REALLY love Obama. You can kiss your riding goodbye. Forget oil, Obama has already stated he doesn't want drilling. He thinks conservation will work to make up the difference. i guess when you outlaw driving that would work.

Policies?
WHAT POLICIES?? ALL HE HAS IS A BUNCH OF PROMISES WITH ZERO SUBSTANCE. WHAT HAS HE DONE?? HAVE YOU LOOKED AT HIS RECORD.
Oh wait, HE HAS NO RECORD.
I can tell you how great I am, I will save the world, make your childeren smarter, increase your lifespan to 2000 years.
VOTE FOR ME

IT'S JUST WORDS.
The man scares the chit outta me and anyone that believes all the BS he spews hasn't even really looked past all the glitz and glitter.

Tell me what he has done?
Show me his voting record.
Show me how he will do all the chit he has promised.
Explain to my poor uneducated self how he is going to keep my riding areas open.
Look up his vice presidents voting record and you will see what will happen.

Oh, and he says he wants to focus on Afganistan. Have you seen anything on what his plans are for Iraq?? You remember that, that would be the place he said we couldn't win in and should run for it while we can.

Is this a bait and switch? So are you agreeing that he has a good plan about Afghanistan? You seemed to completely blow off my rebuttal about his thoughts on Afghanistan.
again.
Don't give me "I think" or "I feel" or "I hate bush".

Again, response in bold
 
He wants to let the bush tax cuts expire which WILL raise the taxes on everyone (the bush tax cuts were across the board, so letting them expire will raise the taxes across the board).

Again, his plan is only to let them expire for those that make more then 250K.... not everyone

This is ONE of the BIGGEST lies he and his supporters tell on a daily basis and let me tell you why. FORCED HEALTH CARE. I run a small business, other than my debt my health insurance is my largest expense. He is going to force me to pay for health insurance for my employees. So which employees will I have to provide it for? The full time? The part time? or both? If I only have to provide it for full time then you better beleive I will reduce ALL of my full time guys to part time. If I have to provide it for part time as well you better beleive that most of them will be laid off and it could put me out of biz because part time employees dont make enough money for the company to justify what it will cost. This is a serious threat to our economy and by my guess will skyrocket unemployment into the 20%+ range or higher instantly. By so doing he will bankrupt social security because low paying jobs do much to support soc sec. He will cause a run on the unemployment claims and this will send us into the great depression all over again, if Barney Fwank hasnt sent us there already. Health Insurance is a luxury you earn, NOT A RIGHT and no where is it listed in our constitution.
Its a nice fluffy thought that everyone should pay 10 dollars to visit the dr but there are somethings we just cant afford, especially now that our countries largest source of income has deid, construction.
 
He wants to let the bush tax cuts expire which WILL raise the taxes on everyone (the bush tax cuts were across the board, so letting them expire will raise the taxes across the board).

Again, his plan is only to let them expire for those that make more then 250K.... not everyone

This is ONE of the BIGGEST lies he and his supporters tell on a daily basis and let me tell you why. FORCED HEALTH CARE. I run a small business, other than my debt my health insurance is my largest expense. He is going to force me to pay for health insurance for my employees. So which employees will I have to provide it for? The full time? The part time? or both? If I only have to provide it for full time then you better beleive I will reduce ALL of my full time guys to part time. If I have to provide it for part time as well you better beleive that most of them will be laid off and it could put me out of biz because part time employees dont make enough money for the company to justify what it will cost. This is a serious threat to our economy and by my guess will skyrocket unemployment into the 20%+ range or higher instantly. By so doing he will bankrupt social security because low paying jobs do much to support soc sec. He will cause a run on the unemployment claims and this will send us into the great depression all over again, if Barney Fwank hasnt sent us there already. Health Insurance is a luxury you earn, NOT A RIGHT and no where is it listed in our constitution.
Its a nice fluffy thought that everyone should pay 10 dollars to visit the dr but there are somethings we just cant afford, especially now that our countries largest source of income has deid, construction.

Freak, you are exactly right. I ran my own grading business for 26 years. Fifteen years ago I could take home .50 to .60 cents on a dollar and when it got down to .10 cents I was my only employee and I got by another 10 years this way but my equipment is now all 30 years old. This statement is crude but I firmly believe it. How can the people of this country think you can knock the dog poop out of business day after day, year after year and expect us to keep writing out the paychecks for the middle class, let alone give them health insurance? If You elect That damn Obama this country may well not survive as we know it now and that is no BS! And not only that, Obama has put the desegregation movement back 40 years. The rest of his race ought to be real proud of him and Michelle.
 
Last edited:
Heavily regulated?? How is that possible since they were de-regulated??
Ever hear of ACORN?? Ya know, the organization that Obama worked for that forced the banks to make more toxic loans in the name of "fairness". Another step towards socialism. Then Clinton forced Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac to buy up those toxic loans, that then freed up the banks to make all the loans they wanted and make a fortune in the process?? I know EXACTLY what caused this and how far back it goes. IT started way before Obama, he just helped it along once he hooked up with acorn. Oh, and a side note, McCain was the one that tried to stop the mess and was stopped by the dems. LOOK IT UP!

So did Obama..... Obama letter

Interesting article about loans and minorities...

Ruffy what in the FRAC does this article have to do with anything. I've read Ollie's statement several times, I can't find anywhere that he blamed the mess on minorities. This article is a basic heart string redirection article. What Ollie's talking about is guaranteed loan to poor people that couldn't afford them. This entire article somehow tries to make it a race issue. It's not. It's an issue of forcing lenders to lend to poor people. I'm all for helping the poor better themselves, but when you have a loan ratio quota to meet, you make bad small loans, so you can continue making big loans.
 
Ruffy what in the FRAC does this article have to do with anything. I've read Ollie's statement several times, I can't find anywhere that he blamed the mess on minorities. This article is a basic heart string redirection article. What Ollie's talking about is guaranteed loan to poor people that couldn't afford them. This entire article somehow tries to make it a race issue. It's not. It's an issue of forcing lenders to lend to poor people. I'm all for helping the poor better themselves, but when you have a loan ratio quota to meet, you make bad small loans, so you can continue making big loans.

You are correct... I didn't interpret what he was saying correctly... you know what they say about assuming... I look stupid on snowest! lol

Maybe I just liked the article, because it was contrary to what I have heard many people say about the causes of the mortgage crises... and extrapolated that to be what Ollie was saying...

Here is a good article about the CRA Community Reinvestment Act

Quote from wiki
Some commentators note that CRA regulated loans tend to be safe and profitable, and that subprime excesses came mainly from institutions not regulated by the CRA. In the February 2008 House hearing, law professor Michael S. Barr, a Treasury Department official under President Clinton,[60][32] stated that a Federal Reserve survey showed that affected institutions considered CRA loans profitable and not overly risky. He noted that approximately 50% of the subprime loans were made by independent mortgage companies that were not regulated by the CRA. Another 25% to 30% came from only partially CRA regulated bank subsidiaries and affiliates. He stated that institutions fully regulated by CRA made "perhaps" one in four sub-prime loans. Referring to CRA and abuses in the subprime market, Michael Barr stated that in his judgment "the worst and most widespread abuses occurred in the institutions with the least federal oversight". [61] According to Janet L. Yellen, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, independent mortgage companies made "high-priced loans" at more than twice the rate of the banks and thrifts; most CRA loans were responsibly made, and were not the higher-priced loans that have contributed to the current crisis.[62] A 2008 study by Traiger & Hinckley LLP, a law firm that counsels financial institutions on CRA compliance, found that CRA regulated institutions were less likely to make subprime loans, and when they did the interest rates were lower. CRA banks were also half as likely to resell the loans.[63]

Assistant professor of law Alan M. White[64] notes that some abuses blamed on the CRA actually occurred because the Housing and Urban Development and Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight under the Bush administration allowed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to fulfill their affordable housing goals by buying subprime mortgage-backed securities. These affordable housing goals were motivated by similar aims, but not part of the CRA.[65]


Wiki on Sub-prime...


I see this as a very strong contribution to the market problems....

Speculation

Speculation in real estate was a contributing factor. During 2006, 22% of homes purchased (1.65 million units) were for investment purposes, with an additional 14% (1.07 million units) purchased as vacation homes. During 2005, these figures were 28% and 12%, respectively. In other words, nearly 40% of home purchases (record levels) were not primary residences. NAR's chief economist at the time, David Lereah, stated that the fall in investment buying was expected in 2006. "Speculators left the market in 2006, which caused investment sales to fall much faster than the primary market."[33]

While homes had not traditionally been treated as investments like stocks, this behavior changed during the housing boom. For example, one company estimated that as many as 85% of condominium properties purchased in Miami were for investment purposes. Media widely reported the behavior of purchasing condominiums prior to completion, then "flipping" (selling) them for a profit without ever living in the home.[34] Some mortgage companies identified risks inherent in this activity as early as 2005, after identifying investors assuming highly leveraged positions in multiple properties.[35]

Keynesian economist Hyman Minsky described three types of speculative borrowing that can contribute to the accumulation of debt that eventually leads to a collapse of asset values:[36][37] the "hedge borrower" who borrows with the intent of making debt payments from cash flows from other investments; the "speculative borrower" who borrows based on the belief that they can service interest on the loan but who must continually roll over the principal into new investments; and the "Ponzi borrower" (named for Charles Ponzi), who relies on the appreciation of the value of their assets (e.g. real estate) to refinance or pay-off their debt but cannot repay the original loan.

The role of speculative borrowing has been cited as a contributing factor to the subprime mortgage crisis.[38]
 
Last edited:
as for his tax plan. I suggest you do a little homework. In order to do what he wants, he would have to increase the taxes on everyone making more than 42,000 a year. Go to the General Accounting Office research office and LOOK IT UP.

There is no General Accounting Office research office

Is this where you meant?

I need a pointer to this one, I can't see any tax raises for anyone up to about $150K.

McCain and Obama couldn't be different. McCain wants to rid us of taxes that don't make sense, like AMT.

Obama wants to create tax credits and reduce taxes on anyone making less than $50K a year. There all over the place. Earned income credit increase. 10 percent credit for home loans. Reduce or eliminate payroll tax, the last tax they actually have to pay (although it's not suppose to be a tax). Zero taxes on the elderly. Elimanate tax altogether on 10million low end workers, a $1000 economic stimulus give away to the Not-Rich, a $500 payroll economic stimulus credit to the Not-Rich, ........

Notice how many tax cliffs Obama is placing in the system. No tax below this line, then full tax suddenly. So, if your a senior making $49K a year, you sure as heck better not start making $50.1K per year, or suddenly your taxed fully. Cliffs make people work less. There's lots of examples of this, the $250K cliff is a big one also.

Can you say class warfare. He'll reach across the aisle, as long as you are poor.

Here's a long, somewhat unbiased comparison of the two: Candidate TaxPlans
I say somewhat, because you can see those better / worse comparisons, when talking about giving the poor something.
 
Last edited:
I need a pointer to this one, I can't see any tax raises for anyone up to about $150K.

McCain and Obama couldn't be different. McCain wants to rid us of taxes that don't make sense, like AMT.

Obama wants to create tax credits and reduce taxes on anyone making less than $50K a year. There all over the place. Earned income credit increase. 10 percent credit for home loans. Reduce or eliminate payroll tax, the last tax they actually have to pay (although it's not suppose to be a tax). Zero taxes on the elderly. Elimanate tax altogether on 10million low end workers, a $1000 economic stimulus give away to the Not-Rich, a $500 payroll economic stimulus credit to the Not-Rich, ........

Notice how many tax cliffs Obama is placing in the system. No tax below this line, then full tax suddenly. So, if your a senior making $49K a year, you sure as heck better not start making $50.1K per year, or suddenly your taxed fully. Cliffs make people work less. There's lots of examples of this, the $250K cliff is a big one also.

Can you say class warfare. He'll reach across the aisle, as long as you are poor.

Here's a long, somewhat unbiased comparison of the two: Candidate TaxPlans
I say somewhat, because you can see those better / worse comparisons, when talking about giving the poor something.

now that my friends is a cogent argument.!!! i wish i could process my thoughts into writing like that. good job wade!:beer;
 
Earned income credit increase. 10 percent credit for home loans. Reduce or eliminate payroll tax, the last tax they actually have to pay (although it's not suppose to be a tax). Elimanate tax altogether on 10million low end workers, a $1000 economic stimulus give away to the Not-Rich, a $500 payroll economic stimulus credit to the Not-Rich

Good points.. but don't the above examples try and make it more worthwhile for people to work instead of just live off the government? If a person gets off welfare and gets a job because of this.. isn't that a net benefit to the system, and aren't we (Americans) going to be paying less?
 
Good points.. but don't the above examples try and make it more worthwhile for people to work instead of just live off the government? If a person gets off welfare and gets a job because of this.. isn't that a net benefit to the system, and aren't we (Americans) going to be paying less?

Yes, the intension of earned income tax credit (EITC) was that anyone willing to go get a job, that didn't earn a lot, could get some money to reward them for working. This is a good idea in my book, it gets people out there being productive and contributing, with the hope being that they would eventually earn more and get off EITC. But, the problem is, they didn't establish a minimum qualification, or definition of what is "earned income". Show me this.

IRS: EITC FAQ

There are maximum qualifications, but no minimum qualifications. Literally, if someone hires you to do 1 hours worth of work, you can get up to $4700 put right in your pocket, for 1 hours work. This just invites theft, IMO.

By the way, this was intended as a temporary relief back in 1975, it just never ended. Now that minimum wage is increasing again, they only talk of raising EITC. Why are temporary reliefs to the rich, called giveaways, (ie capital gains) yet giveaways to the poor called "earned"?

If you wanted to fix it simple, only give it to people that work some minimum number of hours a year, or pick up garbage as a community service. Say 600 hours a year to start with. More hours, more earned.
 
Premium Features



Back
Top