Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

North American Union?? Is this for real???

it is no secret that the elites are after a world government, this would bring us one step closer.

Why do you think we have such an open border policy going on in the US? You better believe the threat is real
They are trying to take away our god given and constitutional rights

Many people do not see the light, but the signs are everywhere, do some research and form your own opinion

infowars.com

My eyes are open and over my dead body
 
And the leveling of both fuel prices and dollar values between Canada and US. :eek: Makes it that much easier to introduce the Amero.
 
Seems to me that things are definitly heading in that direction already.. What the hell is wrong with our country??? We are loosing right and freedoms we faught hard to get, each and every day! Just makes me sick!!!


'If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.' - Ronald Reagan


Wish he was running for pres. again! looks like we are already a nation gone under!
 
Heck, who cares if the Canucks cross the boarder, and the Mex's already are freely. Since their all moving here, the least they can do is give us their country. Might be come cheap ocean front property in Mehico for us gringos, eh. :)
 
thats an easy statement to make.... now substantiate it.:eek:

I figured that was coming. Anyway, first think about why we would even consider joining with Mexico or Canada. How would we economically benefit? Mexico's economy is even worse than ours is right now. If we joined with them we would be supporting them the entire way. That certainly wouldn't be economically beneficial to us. It would be like when East and West Germany consolidated. It wouldn't be such a big deal if we were more economically equal. I just don't understand how we are going to benefit from joining up with Canada and Mexico? Please explain.

Second. The statement about the European Union isn't all that true. One of the reasons the EU formed was to make trading amongst countries easier. That is why they adopted the same currency. Having the same currency also made traveling amongst countries much easier. Another reason they got together was to prevent war. They are also cooperating to help preserve the environment. There are several other reasons the EU formed that don't come to my mind right now. The EU is not one big country as the video implies. The EU takes many different stances on different topics, like the war in Iraq. Some countries are for it and some are against it.

Third. Where are the facts/references about this video. Seems like it could be pretty easily made up to me.

Fourth. Do you really think everyone in the entire world is going to fall for this?

Keep in mind it is late as I right this. I haven't even put all that much time or effort into my argument. Please give me some solid reasons and sources as to why I should believe this and maybe I will change my view or continue to back up my belief.
 
I pretty much agree with you M-ATE on this ever happening as the video shows, but you can not deny our country is morphing into something different than our founding fathers had planned. Our country is fk'd up right now and people are fighting to take more rights away than to retain them. It just scares me to hell, to think where our country will be in 50 years.
 
That has to be some of the most severe democratic propaganda that I have ever heard.
9 minutes of my life I will never get back!!:mad:
 
Conspiracy Theory...a.k.a. BS

Canada and Mexico have vast reserves of Oil, N Gas, Minerals, it's a no brainer.
As we all know real wealth comes from resources, the US tried the finiancial inovation resource, creating wealth by from stealing it it from the rest of the world but they have caught on to that trick.
Looks like it's time to play the Borg and assimilate everyone.
 
Canada and Mexico have vast reserves of Oil, N Gas, Minerals, it's a no brainer.
As we all know real wealth comes from resources, the US tried the finiancial inovation resource, creating wealth by from stealing it it from the rest of the world but they have caught on to that trick.
Looks like it's time to play the Borg and assimilate everyone.

So what your saying is now the only way to get resources from Canada and Mexico (and the rest of the world) is to force them to join together with us or wage war and take it from them? Trading with them to get their resources is no longer an option? Why? The US has nothing left of any value to trade?
 
News Flash, the USA has more coal than we can use. Global Warming CO2 limits are the only thing in our way. And, we don't have to play the stupid GW game. Besides, if we want Canada or Mexico's oil, we'll just pay for it. Lot cheaper than taking it, and they do all the work. Here's some worthless paper money for your oil.
 
North American Union

Do they do sewer stuff? I've got a big turd that I need removed, :face-icon-small-hap
 
As for how the US would benefit?? IMO it would strengthen Mexico's economy and make for better paying jobs/more $$ for them, and save us billions of dollars that we spend on immigration related expenses and crime/border patrol.


Here's a copy/paste of the facts....


[edit] History of the North American Union concept
Main articles: Independent Task Force on North America and Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America
In the 20th century the first well-known proposal for a form of North American unification was the North American technate proposed by Technocracy Incorporated in their Technocracy Study Course published first in 1934. The technate would include not only Canada, the U.S., and Mexico, but also Central America, the Caribbean, Greenland, and parts of South America. A technate governing North America remains an objective of the organization.[6]

Most mainstream interest in a North American Union has focused on the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP) which finds its origins in proposals for increasing integration in the NAFTA trade bloc during President Bush's first term. Such ideas were commonly called proposals for a NAFTA plus.[7] Former President Vicente Fox of Mexico proposed such an agreement including a NAFTA energy policy, a security NAFTA policy, an advance in financial institutions interchanged,[8] and according to other reports a common market, development fund, migration agreement and new institutions.[9] Fox said such an agreement would take the U.S. and Mexico to a "further integration" and eventually seeking a "convergence" of their economies allowing them to "erase that border".[10]

The attacks of September 11, 2001 turned the focus of integration towards American concerns about security and away from Mexican concerns about immigration and open borders.[11] When the SPP was formed in 2005, a migration agreement was not mentioned focusing instead on synchronizing regulatory policy, reducing congestion at the border, and rationalizing external tariffs. The SPP, however, did include Canadian proposals for reducing congestion at the border.[7]

Prior to the formation of the SPP the Independent Task Force on North America, a project organized by the Council on Foreign Relations (U.S.), the Canadian Council of Chief Executives, and the Mexican Council on Foreign Relations, launched in October 2004, published two documents calling for greater integration between the three countries: Trinational Call for a North American Economic and Security Community by 2010 (March 2005) and its final report Building a North American Community[12] (May 2005).

Their final report, which has been described as "an academic exercise with pretensions of reaching policymakers,"[11] proposed increased international cooperation between the nations of Canada, the United States, and Mexico, similar in some respects to that of the European Community that preceded the European Union. The report called for "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community, the boundaries of which would be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter." No recommendation was made for a common currency or a supranational institution like the European Union. The report said that a North American Community should not rely on "grand schemes of confederation or union".[12]

In reference to the March 2005 summit in Waco, Texas that established the SPP, the task force's final report stated, "We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts."[13] These specific recommendations include developing a North American customs union, common market, investment fund, energy strategy, set of regulatory standards, security perimeter, border pass, and advisory council, among other common goals.

The formation of the SPP, the reports from the Independent Task Force, and comments from Vicente Fox were cited as evidence for a planned North American Union. Theories about an ongoing plan are predominant on the Internet, especially among bloggers and other writers.[1] Jerome Corsi's columns on WorldNetDaily and Human Events, as well as his best-selling book The Late Great U.S.A.: The Coming Merger With Mexico and Canada, formed the core of NAU conspiracy theories.[5] Corsi himself is often referred to as the leader of the anti-North American Union movement.[
 
Premium Features



Back
Top