Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

My KTM 500 EXC turbo project

Thread Rating
5.00 star(s)

swedenturbo

Well-known member
Lifetime Membership
Here is my latest project, turbocharging my 2012 KTM 500 EXC
Today i put it on the dyno.
The result was better than I expected.
Peak power 96,86 hp at 10,1 pounds of boost.
Stock power was 55,6 hp.
Putting up some photos of by build. The dyno charts comes at the end of this post.

Running a rear mount layout. Keeping the exhaust stock. Just replacing the muffler with the turbo. I believe that rearmount is good at smoothing out the powerful exhaust pulses that can be a problem when turbocharging single cylinder engines.

a15.jpg

Using a pressure lubricaded non ballbearing turbo. Took a oilfilter cap from a KTM690 which have a threded hole to connect the oil feed line.

a13.jpg

One thing that is good with the KTM500 is that it has pressure lubricated big end connecting rod bearing. Most of dirt bikes have roller bearing and a very low oil pressure
Checked the oil presure with a guage, over 46 PSI. Mitsubichi have a recomendation at minimum 37 if I recall.
Now I can be sure that the turbo get the correct lubrication-

a6.jpg

The biggest job in the project was designing and building the plenum. Tried to use all the avaliable space to get a very large plenum.
Started with a mockup out of wood then make it in 2 mm aluminum.

a14.jpg

The volume of plenum endet at about 4-5 liters.
The triangular thing on the side is a mount for BOV.

a9.jpg

Using the MCXpress piggyback fuel injection. A extra fuel injector in plenum delivers extra fuel.

a11.jpg

Fuel rail

a4.jpg

The injector is placed just at the intake of the throttlebody.

a7.jpg

Bigger power reqires a firmer chlutch. KTM using beleville spring. Order another spring and just put in over the stock spring. Now I have double spring force.

a12.jpg

A adaptor at the oil fill plug connects the oil return line from turbo

a16.jpg

Pressure oil feed from oil filter to turbo
a18.jpg


a17.jpg

Put isulating wrap around the exhaust.

a2.jpg

Not a very good looking mount for the temprary intercooler but it's just for puting it on the dyno. I will later make a smaller and mount it on the tube frame of my snowbike.
a3.jpg

Dyno test at MCXpress.
The results looks promising from start. Just over 84 hp at moderate 8 PSI.
Checking with lambda guage to get right air fuel ratio.

a1.jpg

Finally the tuning is done. Must say that restults exceeded my expectations! The theoretical power and the final result was pretty spot on. That shows that it's running very good.
Peak power 96,86 hp at 10,1 pounds of boost.
Torque 85 Nm

Turbo.jpg
 
Last edited:
Did you leave the motor stock? What turbo 16T kinda size, GT22? What does it need for octane? Another question, why make the plenum so big, thats probably more volume then I have on my Nypex? Your project is exactly what I've been thinking of doing, awesome.

Thx M5
 
Last edited:
Once you get this thing all dialed, and assuming the motor stays together, is this something you are able to replicate and sell for us to install on our bikes?

I know it's too early to say, but any idea how much this will cost? I'll start saving now!

Jon
 
I look at snowbikes as the latest greatest way to kill my self ,,,,I think this will do it!!:face-icon-small-ton
 
Sick sick sick.
With that much power what kind of gearing you going to to run?
I think it will stay together with the proper help and since he is in Sweden mcx will for sure keep it together.
Keep us posted!!
 
Thats what i'm talking about ! Other than that little black injector LOL ! Can't wait to try a 100HP bike !
 
Thank you guys. :face-icon-small-hap. I'm really excited over the dyno result. This looks promising.

The engine is stock compression ratio 11,5:1.
I wanted to keep the enginge untouched if it would'nt work and I had to ditch the idea of a turbo kit.
Running race fuel for now. 102 octane RON
Not a cheap fuel but hopefully these snowbikes don't consume that much so I think you can handle the extra cost, time will tell.
I will probably end up installing 1,5 mm head chim to lower compresion and run pump gas.

The Mitsubichi turbocharger is from the MCX turbocharged Yamaha Phazer.
It's smaller than the Mitsubishi 16T.

The plenum is really oversize when you compare to other turbocharged multi cylinder engines. I think a big plenum is important on single cylinder engine. Big plenum will smooth out the intake pulses.

The recent test was at 10,1 pounds of boost.
I will lower it to 8-9 pounds so play safe. At that boost it will crank just over 90 horses. At the end of the day it's all about reliability.
The wastegate acuator spring was too firm.
Also the wastegate opening is a bit small to get enough bypass.
Will grind it up a bit to lower the boost.

Not only the horsepower looks good. The tourqe 80 Nm is pretty close to a 600 snowmobile :face-icon-small-hap
 
Last edited:
I can see at full throttle having the larger plenum, I'll be curious to see how it works when you just roll on the power. Thanks for being the guinea pig for the rest of us turbo freaks. LOL


M5
 
We'll have to wait a month to see how it performs in real snowbike conditions. No snow here yet in the north of Sweden:face-icon-small-sad

Judging from how it performed on the dyno was very smooth power delivery over all the prm range.
No splutter or missfiring, almost like a stock bike.
 
I guarantee to keep you guys informed in how it behaves with both race gas and pump gas.
First I'll run with standard compresion. When I'm broke buing expensive race fuel I will test pump gas configuration.
Not a big deal to put in a shim and see how it performs.
 
It will likely not behave quite as well if you shim the motor, so maybe its worth it to use the race gas.

M5

I don't think it will behave much differently.
Top end power will be more like same, maybe a little less. -2 to -4 percent.
The big difference by loweing compression ratio will be low end power/torque.
Big question is how much I have to lower compresion to safely prevent detonation with pump gas.
 
Thanks Ken
Alot of work after dyno testing.
IC, elecrics, oiling, piping and so on. You'll have to wait for some real testing. Hopefully at the end of december.
Fitting the plastics

a24_zpsc026073a.jpg
 
Last edited:
Premium Features



Back
Top