Must Watch
- Thread starter Transporter
- Start date
Interesting. I guess once he signs it, we'll have to get serious about determining he was never eligible to be president, and therefore could not have signed for us. 
The same groups that have been pushing new world order, sounds like.
Here it is I doubt anyone could read this from beginning to end without cutting their wrists .... who writes this stuff who knows whats hidden in there.
http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/un-fccc-copenhagen-2009.pdf
http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/un-fccc-copenhagen-2009.pdf
Last edited:
Somebody posted this....
Page 18: Section 38 of the "Shared vision for long-term cooperation action plan" contains the text for forming the new government and redistribution of wealth!
Page 40: Section 46 Subsection H of the "Objectives, scope, and guiding principles" contains the text for enforcement and establishment of the rule of law!!
http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/un-fccc-copenhagen-2009.pdf
Page 18: Section 38 of the "Shared vision for long-term cooperation action plan" contains the text for forming the new government and redistribution of wealth!
Page 40: Section 46 Subsection H of the "Objectives, scope, and guiding principles" contains the text for enforcement and establishment of the rule of law!!
http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/un-fccc-copenhagen-2009.pdf
Nice Transporter:
Well, for the gullible idiots that got on here and preached the purity of the science surrounding global warming, and argued that there's no reason someone would have cause to "FIX" the data, here you go. It's all about WORLD WELFARE. Technology and financial transfer to the third world. Or, more appropriately, to some dictators pocket. All through this document, it spews references to "historical responsibility", "obligations of developed countries", money from developed countries, and plain welfare. I say frack the world. In the teachings of Jefferson, let us not enter into any entanglements (treaties or contracts) with foreign countries, let us just do trade with all. If Obama signs this crap, does it have to be ratified by the Senate? Maybe it's time to push back.
They have thought of everything. My first thought was, lets ban imports from China, to save the environment.
Hummm, another words, developing countries don't have to do carp, if they don't get all the welfare they want from developed counties. From what I see, this is a totally open ended obligation, and all money and carbon cutting requirements will change until the desired result is meet. Another words, this aint all your going to pay.
Well, for the gullible idiots that got on here and preached the purity of the science surrounding global warming, and argued that there's no reason someone would have cause to "FIX" the data, here you go. It's all about WORLD WELFARE. Technology and financial transfer to the third world. Or, more appropriately, to some dictators pocket. All through this document, it spews references to "historical responsibility", "obligations of developed countries", money from developed countries, and plain welfare. I say frack the world. In the teachings of Jefferson, let us not enter into any entanglements (treaties or contracts) with foreign countries, let us just do trade with all. If Obama signs this crap, does it have to be ratified by the Senate? Maybe it's time to push back.
They have thought of everything. My first thought was, lets ban imports from China, to save the environment.
Hummm, another words, developing countries don't have to do carp, if they don't get all the welfare they want from developed counties. From what I see, this is a totally open ended obligation, and all money and carbon cutting requirements will change until the desired result is meet. Another words, this aint all your going to pay.
Last edited:
Nice Transporter:
Well, for the gullible idiots that got on here and preached the purity of the science surrounding global warming, and argued that there's no reason someone would have cause to "FIX" the data, here you go. It's all about WORLD WELFARE. Technology and financial transfer to the third world. Or, more appropriately, to some dictators pocket. All through this document, it spews references to "historical responsibility", "obligations of developed countries", money from developed countries, and plain welfare. I say frack the world. In the teachings of Jefferson, let us not enter into any entanglements (treaties or contracts) with foreign countries, let us just do trade with all. If Obama signs this crap, does it have to be ratified by the Senate? Maybe it's time to push back.
from what i gather no it does not have to be voted on by the senate!
They have thought of everything. My first thought was, lets ban imports from China, to save the environment.
Hummm, another words, developing countries don't have to do carp, if they don't get all the welfare they want from developed counties. From what I see, this is a totally open ended obligation, and all money and carbon cutting requirements will change until the desired result is meet. Another words, this aint all your going to pay.
