I see a lot of posts extolling the virtues of various aftermarket suspension set ups but what is the marked difference in the ride quality that a stock set up doesn’t provide? I can see for jumping, drops, etc but when in the good stuff and carving turns in pow which is a very soft substrate, what is the benefit? my next snowcheck is likely not gonna be a Freeride because I’m not the cornice dropping, jumping machine I thought I was gonna be so what am I losing going to the more basic set up say on the X from a suspension point of view?
You will notice a difference coming from a freeride suspension to a x valved suspension, especially the loss of the reservoirs.
I have not owned a Freeride, but I know the difference in the shocks.
A expert suspension is valves different than a x as well.
The revalved suspension is tuned to your weight and riding style is the main reason to do it over buying a big name brand.
Stock is a lot softer, the first G5 expert I seen on the show room floor it had a lot of sag, because it’s valved soft at the start of the travel, and that was without a rider and Weight the tunnel.
As I mentioned it’s a noticeable difference in ride height over my brother stock valved expert.
Now as for the ride quality, the sled is more predictable, and the ski lift control is 100% better than the stock valving. No need for the adjustable limiter strap, you can set the ski lift with the front shock. Deep snow starts to me seem better than a stock valved sled, the sled get up on the snow.
No I will probably get roasted for this, a torsion suspension has more adjustment and just rides better. That being said, Now where I absolutely love the Enzo is on a long whooped out trail, the suspension does not fade, and get hot like the stock valves shocks do.
It’s all in what you like, I prefer a stiffer more adjustable suspension than what stock provides.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk