I have used PCV controllers too. They are not a cure all. You sacrifice the strength of your spark using the ignition control module. The ignition driver really weakens the spark output because the driver is low quality and inefficient. That may not cause you problems with an NA sled if you have low enough compression. But, it won't work if you run a turbo. I tried it many times on such setups. It will cause misfires as the boost comes up because cylinder pressure will blow the weak spark out. You can reduce the spark gap, but that provides little improvement. This problem also gets worse as your octane goes up; this is a problem for sleds running race fuel or high compression. So, a high compression big bore may have problems too.
At the end of the day, why are you allergic to putting the correct computer in it? The factory spent all the dyno time and money to optimize timing and to maintain reliability, so you don't have to. Chances are, you won't dyno the sled, so you will never get the timing curve right. And, timing is everything when it comes to making power. This is not a guess, I tune race engines. Really think through this advice because your sled won't run right, or you will start collecting pistons.
At the end of the day, you may be happy with a soft 1000 motor, but that seems counter to what your goal is. Don't let the fact that you have a controller for an 800 drive your decisions for building a 1000. You will spend a lot to build it, and it won't run great until you put in the dyno time to get the tune spot on, or you buy correct stuff for a 1000.
Lastly, you are making a big assumption that all the sensors are not only the same between the two engines but are also scaled the same. If they are not identical in every way, it won't run right. Food for thought...I have spent the dyno time, so you don't have to.