Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

SW Video Is a $67k dollar snowmobile worth it?

im spelling this wrong, but the Mickue brothers here in BC made an all carbon doo based chassis quite a few yrs ago. I think C3 engineering had a hand in it.
 
Do you here that Polaris and Ski Doo? Sounds like people will be happy with 5 gallon tanks!! Not!! Just think of the media they could put out. We dropped our weight 30-40 lbs on the new 2027's. I am surprised Polaris hasn't actually reduced there's down a gallon or so to reduce their wet weight by 6-10lbs.
Ha ha. It's not for everyone. Burandt and Muskoka are competitive. I get it that you're not. Kind of like looking at a ferrari and saying they suck because you can't afford one or don't want one. Yes, they have to pack gas but those 2 sleds rip like nothing else. All in what you want out of your day. Not for everyone but that doesn't make it ridiculous.
 
Life isn't fair. Why is 5 gallons ridiculous? That sled rips.
Who is it you see packing gas? It's mostly turbo types who easily burn through a whole 12g tank. Please, someone report back if you meet anyone on the hill packing gas so they could run a smaller tank. I think Skinz did ok to sacrifice a few gallons to slim up the tank: it's still enough for a lot of people, while 5g means packing gas for most of us. I can see doing it just to force yourself into minimum weight when it matters, but it's a 1% kind of rider who's going to find it worth the hassle of juggling tunnel tanks. Nothing wrong with the sled, but the tiny tank seems like an experiment - I don't think you'll see anyone copying it in the wild.
 
Who is it you see packing gas? It's mostly turbo types who easily burn through a whole 12g tank. Please, someone report back if you meet anyone on the hill packing gas so they could run a smaller tank. I think Skinz did ok to sacrifice a few gallons to slim up the tank: it's still enough for a lot of people, while 5g means packing gas for most of us. I can see doing it just to force yourself into minimum weight when it matters, but it's a 1% kind of rider who's going to find it worth the hassle of juggling tunnel tanks. Nothing wrong with the sled, but the tiny tank seems like an experiment - I don't think you'll see anyone copying it in the wild.
I used to always pack gas. Now it depends on the day. Better to have and not need than need and not have. The 5 gallon tank was from the race department. Most can't even get one. I ran the skins tank on a 21 axys. It was awesome. 5 would be a pain but revert back to what you want out of a day. Watch the Muskoka video with 154 under it. It walks all over the other sleds. I know you don't want one and I get it. Most won't but it's not ridiculous.
 
back in the early days of mod sleds "88 and up" for me .we all ran a 5 gallon tank and packed gas, but we were pretty much just climbing anything that looked scary to climb so weight was key. We werent tree riding and climbing, it was all about the vertical. just like what Turboless is saying depends on what you want out of your day
 
I put an aftermarket tank on my kids sled and a gas rack so they can pack gas for me. Just like I did with my Dad.

He'd only put half a tank in his sled to have that power to weight advantage. Nevermind I was packing at least one 5g jerry can and wasn't allowed to drop it at the gas drop....ever. lol And that was 25-30 years ago!
 
Lets not forget that Muskoka's sled came up because of RTR weights - and that empty bragging point would be the only noticeable benefit in a typical day of riding. I'm guessing a 5g tank is a couple pounds lighter (empty), but unless you're also dropping things like your spare belt to shave weight, you're admitting it's not worth it. If that's you, then point stipulated. If that's not you, defending a tiny tank and talking about how you pack gas in the same breath makes for quite an uphill battle.
 
Lets not forget that Muskoka's sled came up because of RTR weights - and that empty bragging point would be the only noticeable benefit in a typical day of riding. I'm guessing a 5g tank is a couple pounds lighter (empty), but unless you're also dropping things like your spare belt to shave weight, you're admitting it's not worth it. If that's you, then point stipulated. If that's not you, defending a tiny tank and talking about how you pack gas in the same breath makes for quite an uphill battle.
I don't have a dog in this fight but your choice of words caught my eye.

It becomes less of an uphill battle when you can drop a fuel can at the bottom of a hill versus having a bigger tank :ROFLMAO:

If you pack gas, you're not packing it all day long. You drop it off and go ride. Pick it up on the way back and fill up so you can make it back to the truck. That's kinda implied I thought....
 
Yeah cory micku was ripping that thing in 13-15

I rode with his Dad with the original carbon chassis 174" 800 e-tec. It was perfect for the older guys. Super lightweight and the smooth power of a n/a 800. It was ski to ski with the Cutler 1000 156" all day long. That day stuck out so much I now have a carbon chassis PC because of it. With a 900 BB tho cuz I'm not quite bright enough to leave crap stock. lol
 
I don't have a dog in this fight but your choice of words caught my eye.

It becomes less of an uphill battle when you can drop a fuel can at the bottom of a hill versus having a bigger tank :ROFLMAO:

If you pack gas, you're not packing it all day long. You drop it off and go ride. Pick it up on the way back and fill up so you can make it back to the truck. That's kinda implied I thought....
Well played sir! Not that I missed the concept where you drop it off; I even eluded to it, although it didn't seem worth detailing. If packing gas floats your boat, knock yourself out, of course. Just not worth it to me. From now on though, I'm asking every guy I see with tunnel tanks if the main tank is five gallons; should make for interesting conversation.
 
Last edited:
I think its completely awesome what Burandt puts together and totally get what he's saying about it basically being something of an R&D project ... But, unless you are independently wealthy with a metric f*ckton of disposable income, you are wasting your money paying that much money for a snowmobile these days.

I mean really, with what you can do on a stock and/or slightly modded factory turbo these days, 99% of the people buying snowmobiles will never be able to "out ride" that sled ... and maybe 1% of the people who ride would be able to use a sled like that to the fullest, and of that 1% maybe 1% of the original 1% could afford to pay somebody to build that for them without going broke, sooooo ...For the rest of us, what type of riding experience are you really gaining paying $67k for that sled vs. the $20-22k you're paying for a 'factory' sled? Is the riding experience really worth that much more money? i kinda question if it is ...

I mean its cool yeah, but IMO what the entire industry needs right now are videos showing what cool things you can do with CHEAP sleds ... Used sleds from 10 years ago .... to get more people into it. Because with current sled prices, the OEMs and dealers are pricing themselves right out of business IMO.
 
I think its completely awesome what Burandt puts together and totally get what he's saying about it basically being something of an R&D project ... But, unless you are independently wealthy with a metric f*ckton of disposable income, you are wasting your money paying that much money for a snowmobile these days.

I mean really, with what you can do on a stock and/or slightly modded factory turbo these days, 99% of the people buying snowmobiles will never be able to "out ride" that sled ... and maybe 1% of the people who ride would be able to use a sled like that to the fullest, and of that 1% maybe 1% of the original 1% could afford to pay somebody to build that for them without going broke, sooooo ...For the rest of us, what type of riding experience are you really gaining paying $67k for that sled vs. the $20-22k you're paying for a 'factory' sled? Is the riding experience really worth that much more money? i kinda question if it is ...

I mean its cool yeah, but IMO what the entire industry needs right now are videos showing what cool things you can do with CHEAP sleds ... Used sleds from 10 years ago .... to get more people into it. Because with current sled prices, the OEMs and dealers are pricing themselves right out of business IMO.
Meh - been the story since the first sled was modified. We've been building $50+ sleds for 2 decades now. It's always been a waste of money in someone's eyes.
 
Premium Features



Back
Top