Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Interesting

Not sure if this has been posted already or if its even true, but if it is true...hmmm very interesting indeed!




The Constitution is the supreme law in the United States . No judge or other governmental body, not even the Supreme Court, may override it in any circumstance!

Subject: I wonder if the judges will uphold this one.....

Think about this. I always thought that Clinton had something on Obama. A birth certificate is a matter of public record. I wonder where it is.

We know that Obama refuses to release his birth certificate, and for some reason it is not on file in Hawaii , so this is interesting. Is Obama legally eligible to serve as President? Here's something for you to ponder.


SOME TIME AGO HILLARY SAID SHE HAD SOMETHING ON OBAMA THAT WOULD CHANGE THE ELECTION, AND THAT'S WHY SHE ONLY SUSPENDED HER QUEST FOR THE PRESIDENCY. PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO THE TIME FRAME AS YOU READ THIS.

This came from a USNA alumnus. It'll be inte resting to see how the media handles this.

Barack Obama is not a legal U.S. natural-born citizen, according to the law on the books at the time of his birth, which falls between December 24, 1952 to November 13, 1986. Federal Law states that the office of President requires a person be a natural-born citizen, if the child was not born to two U.S. citizen parents. This is what exempts John McCain, though he was born in the US Panama Canal Zone .

US Law very clearly states: ' if only one parent is a U.S. citizen at the time of one's birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for a minimum of ten years, five of which must be after the age of 16'. Barack Obama's father was not a U.S. Citizen, that is a fact.

Obama's mother was only 18 whe n Obama was born. This means even though she had been a U.S. Citizen for 10 years, (or citizen of Hawaii being a territory), his mother fails the test for at-least-5-years-prior- to Barack Obama's birth, but-after-age-16. In essence, mother alone is not old enough to qualify her son for automatic U.S. Citizenship. At most, 2 years elapsed from his mother turning 16 to the time of Barack Obama's birth when she was 18. His mother would have needed to have been 16 + 5 = 21 years old at the time of Barack Obama's birth for him to be a natural-born citizen. The Constitution clearly declares: Naturalized citizens are ineligible to hold the office of President. Though Barack Obama was sent back to Hawaii at age 10, any other information does not matter because his mother is the one who must fulfill the requirement to be a U.S. Citizen for 10 years prior to his birth on August 4, 1961, with 5 of those years being after age 16.

Further, Obama may have had to have remained in the USA for some time frame to protect any citizenship he might have had, rather than living in Indonesia . This is very clear cut and a glaring violation of U.S. Election law. I think that Governor Schwarzenegger of California would be very interested in discovering if Obama is allowed to be elected President without being a natural-born U.S. Citizen, since this would set a precedent. Stay tuned to your TV sets because I suspect some of this information will be leaking throu gh over the next several days.
 
yes very interesting if it was true..but lets say the info is true

Section 1 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitiution clears this all up


Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.




...............next
 
Last edited:
yes very interesting if it was true..but lets say the info is true

Section 1 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitiution clears this all up


Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.




...............next
ummmmm, what does that have to do with the argument of him not being born in the US!!!! a naturalized citizen is not allowed to run for the president, thus the 14th amendment doesn't apply to this particular argument!
 
since he was born in Hawaii he is a natural born citizen...regardless of where his parents are from
 
I never checked it, but I heard snopes.com pretty much nails the mailbox shut on that one

------ Gimpster ------
 
Premium Features



Back
Top