i have a 07 apex mt no boost it has a 163'' under it will it help me if i put a 174 under it i know it will slow my trail riding down but i like to break new trail instead. dues it help to have 3'' lug then 2.5 or all i will is melt slide.
i have a track ?
- Thread starter jeremywendinger
- Start date
The 174 is much better. If you can make it fit the 3" kicks my 2.5" quite easily and on trail performance is about the same.
Someone said a the new 203" 4 1/4 is coming out in July ?
Guess it doesent trench as bad either as the old challenger in 2 1/2
Suppose to be great on the trail to, its articulated !
I say go for it
Guess it doesent trench as bad either as the old challenger in 2 1/2
Suppose to be great on the trail to, its articulated !
I say go for it
I have one on order for my Bravo, estimated track speed 3.247 MPH!!
J
jaysonfreerider
Well-known member
lmao!
lol any pics hahaha
O
Ollie
ACCOUNT CLOSED
ok, now a serious answer.
Unless you are climbing I wouldn't bother.
The difference between the 163 and the 174 is only a couple inches on the ground.
If you are getting stuck with a 163, you will get stuck with a 174.
I run a 155 on my polaris and break windshield deep snow all the time (when ever we get that much snow anyway). The 163 track under the 07 is a good track. Just ride it and don't worry about it.
track ? 2.5'' or 3''
is there a difference between the to
is there a difference between the to
a lot of guys dump the stock track and go with a Camo Extreme 2.5, Night and day difference between the two. But I wouldn't go 174 without some kind of boost
word
Is there a difference between a 2'' and a 2.5" track ? Answer is yes. Nobody said you will have the best sled if you have a 174 x 3" track, but I guarentee you will notice the better performance increase. And as for the difference between a 164 and a 174 it is there also. I have 2 07 revs, one with a 162x2.5 and one with a 174x2.5. Both sleds set up the same and the 174 will out climb the 162 everytime in any condition period. I have compared them side by side on numberous times to say this. For deep powder the 2.5 camo extreme is much better than the stock ski-doo 163. JMHO through actual experiance.
Similar threads
