Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

HR1975 From the politicians mouth?

S

snowbie

Active member
I contacted my state rep about HR1975 and this is what they replied with. I'm pretty surprised I even got a response but here it is. I'm not sure what the hell his position is. Typical politician.


"Thank you for contacting me in regard to H.R. 1975, the Northern Rockies Ecosystem Protection Act (NREPA). I appreciate hearing your thoughts on this important issue.

Like you, I am committed to conserving our natural resources for future generations. At a time when only 5% of America's original pristine forests still remain, I believe it is important to protect these wild areas.

As you may know, H.R. 1975 was introduced by Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney on April 20, 2007. This legislation designates lands in Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Washington, and Wyoming as wilderness components of the National Wilderness Preservation System. Specifically, H.R. 1975 provides wildland areas as Biological Connecting Corridors to protect the Northern Rockies Bioregion, the inventoried roadless areas identified as part of the Corridors as wilderness and components of the System, and certain biological connecting corridors as special corridor management areas.

Additionally, H.R. 1975 amends the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate segments of specified rivers and creeks in Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming as components of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. This bill also establishes the National Wildland Restoration and Recovery System and the National Wildland Recovery Corps. Finally, H.R. 1975 requires the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture to assure non-exclusive access to the specified areas and corridors designated by this Act by Native Americans for traditional cultural and religious purposes.

Our national parks provide opportunities for recreation, family vacations, and educational outings. As a father of two young children, I understand some of your concerns regarding accessibility to these national treasures. I have heard from outdoor enthusiasts like yourself and believe public comment in deciding land use designations is an important step in deciding how best to maintain public lands. I also want to be clear that H.R. 1975 does not adversely affect land within the designated area that is privately owned.

Currently, H.R. 1975 is under review before the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands within the House Natural Resources Committee. Please be assured that I will continue to monitor this issue closely and will keep your thoughts in mind should this legislation reach the House floor for a vote.

Again, thank you for contacting me on this issue. Please don't hesitate to contact me further if you have any additional questions, comments, or concerns on this, or any other issue."


Sincerely,

Adam Smith

Member of Congress
 
I'm not sure I read in his response that he would be looking out for your (our) interests. If I had to put any money on it, he is saying that he is supporting any land locking legislation that comes along because the National Parks will be there to accommodate any required recreating that you feel you must do. I think we are getting the idea that snowmobiles aren't all that welcome in the NP system either.

I hope I'm wrong.

VB
 
Local repreentatives

I sent one to mine also, and got the same B.S. After reading his ( Dave Reichert ) reply, I tend to think he doesn't share the same thoughts as I do. He won't get my vote again!
 
I hope G.W.Bush grows some balls and vetos this---but he'll be looking for an environmental legacy like H did and become a feaking liberal his last year:mad:
 
Well our club had had a meeting a few days ago , Doug Ferral from the "Freinds for the Scoothman Peaks wildernnes" spoke to us. When asked about this bill he said that this bill has been brought before congress for the last few years and nevers makes past that, he said the bill was-is a joke, far to reaching in concept and not a dooable option and his group oppossed it. Kinda caught me off guard. Dino
 
More than likely this POS legislation, along with the CIEDRA bill (HR 222) in Idaho are dead for 2007. They will be back next year so stay tuned. HR 1975 has been around in some incarnation or another since about 1993 and it never makes it past the common sense people.

About the canned responses, are they not about as freaking lame as it it gets? Any more when I write my elected officials, at the end I write "Please feel free NOT to reply to this letter if the reply will be some standard canned response telling me what I already know. If you have something personal to add I would really appreciate it; otherwise please do not waste the postage." I almost never get a response and I am fine with that.
 
Premium Features



Back
Top