How does the pro 600 compare to M7

[OutWest]

The 600 feels like the "old" 700, just my opinion.

 

[m1kflyingtiger]

Ok so we've established that polaris's 600 isn't as strong as the 800. Not sure on top end/lake races as they most likely have different gearing, but this thread is about if it was as much of a runner as an m7. When the m7 came out it was keeping up with other 8's. Some of this due to a strong motor for its size and some to do with the chassis. The m8 that replaced it (up until two seasons ago) only had 5hp more than the 7. We know that Polaris has a VERY strong 600 motor (ive heard claims of the low 130's-yet to see a dyne sheet) and a weak 800 motor ( I THINK dyno Jim had it at 145 hp ish when it came out-can anyone confirm?) and the pro 800, due to better chassis, makes better use out of that lack of power and still climbs right with or better than the m8 and summit 800. I am very much hoping the pro6 really is the little sled that could as I bought a hold over '12.

So with that said, I've followed m7's to places I shouldn't be - can the pro 600 do that as good or better than the m7?

 

[kmg]

So is there much difference between the Pro 600 and 600 I would rather have the 144 inch track. I don't mean to highjack the thread.