Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't worry, we know you tried your best!!If insurance was illegal, only illegals would have insurance....
Actually, it makes no sense, but I thought it was a nice jingle.
Don't worry, we know you tried your best!!![]()
I know, just giving you a hard time.
Na, I simply see both sides of the "argument" here, which makes it tough for me to post on one side or the other.
xrated makes a great point with his November-December deductibles argument, and Chaz makes a good point with his "uninsured illegals" argument. So to simply post twice, saying "I agree" would be...lame. So, deciding that I'm "lame" I figured I would post a silly mockery of "if guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns".
There's my explanation.
So what is supposed to reduce the cost of health care? Illegals / uninsured are only part of the issue.The $200 billion "left over" from TARP they want to waste "creating jobs" would buy private insurance for the famous 30 million for several YEARS. Why not just do that?
Oh yeah. IT WOULDN'T GIVE THE OBAMA POWER OVER YOUR STUPID A$$ !
very true, but there are a lot of different markets out thereTo address cost market forces MUST be in place.
I don't know about compelled... Do you even know how insurance was started?Since the government compelled employers to handle healthcare insurance the consumer has been separated from the real bill. Get insurance OUT of the employer hands and into the employee (not into idiot government hands).
unless this allows insurance companies to get bigger, this will reduce the clout that insurance companies have over the hospital bill, resulting in higher costs. Remember that hospitals and insurance companies NEGOTIATE the costs. They aren't fixed.Remove state boundaries for insurance companies, without raping State's Rights.
this is a small part of the problem. Texas did tort reform, net result was no change to insurance premium prices.Take care of stupid lawsuits and malpractice insurance rates.
I don't know about that one.. I guess so.Remove taxes on medical equipment (not raise them like these idiots will do).
You are talking only about the relationship between insurance providers and people. What about the relationship between insurance providers an care providers?Providers will have to become competitive. Rates will fall through the floor. Look at stuff that's not covered by insurance at all, like elective surgery. Quality goes up & price comes down.
Nothing is ever that simple. As to the control issue, you don't have it anyways. You insurance company does. If your employer offers insurance, then you have even less control.It's that damn simple, but then that's not the real goal. They want POWER. They could give two $h!ts about your damn health!
Nope, we have exactly one and it worked a lot better when government didn't play with it like they have since the 80s.very true, but there are a lot of different markets out there
You miss the point entirely. Healthcare insurance is insuring your stuff and income, not your health. Consumers must handle the costs & bills directly like any other service they get.unless this allows insurance companies to get bigger, this will reduce the clout that insurance companies have over the hospital bill, resulting in higher costs. Remember that hospitals and insurance companies NEGOTIATE the costs. They aren't fixed.
Cost is cost. Who benefits from these tort suits? Lawyers, period.this is a small part of the problem. Texas did tort reform, net result was no change to insurance premium prices.
You "guess" reducing a tax will reduce a cost?I don't know about that one.. I guess so.
market, like housing market, like used auto markets, like insurance, like hospital expenses.Nope, we have exactly one and it worked a lot better when government didn't play with it like they have since the 80s.
You mind explaining that one? I don't handle any costs and few bills for my insurance.You miss the point entirely. Healthcare insurance is insuring your stuff and income, not your health. Consumers must handle the costs & bills directly like any other service they get.
So why did you use this as a point for reducing costs?Cost is cost. Who benefits from these tort suits? Lawyers, period.
agreed, but if taxes are a zero some game, then reducing taxes in one area, increases them in another area. Only looking at the taxes side.You "guess" reducing a tax will reduce a cost?
ALL TAXES ARE PAID BY CONSUMERS.
Corporations do not pay taxes; they collect it from consumers.
How does "health insurance" guarantee your health? It doesn't, it guarantees your checking account.Quote:
Originally Posted by SkiDoobyDoo![]()
You miss the point entirely. Healthcare insurance is insuring your stuff and income, not your health. Consumers must handle the costs & bills directly like any other service they get.
You mind explaining that one? I don't handle any costs and few bills for my insurance.
[/QUOTE]agreed, but if taxes are a zero some game, then reducing taxes in one area, increases them in another area. Only looking at the taxes side.
True it is not a right. Insurance IS someone else paying for your life. Isn't that how it works?Healthcare is a SERVICE others provide, like legal services or garbage collection. None of these are a RIGHT. If you want someone else to pay for your life, then move to Cuba.
and yet they still rank higher then we do...My sister (raging liberal) was there a year or so ago. Absolute mess.
just making the point that if taxes are reduced from one area, it is very likely that they will be increased in another area. You are just shifting costs... nothing really has changed.In the REAL world, there are very few zero SUM games. Taxation is not one of them. Only victims of liberal public education believe that economics is a zero sum game.
You had me until this stuff... I think you are making a very large causality leap thereThe famous "Bush tax cuts" reduced rates on EVERYONE about 3-4%. Net revenues to the government went through the roof!
sure buddy....Free markets generate more than the sum of its parts. It's produces ABUNDANCE.
'Command & control' systems (old USSR, Cuba, China,...) offer only misery and suffering.
I was wrong, they are ranked 39.. we are 37, just better then slovenia it seems.. note they stopped ranking do to the difficulty and I am sure, the ambiguity of the results.HOLY CRAP RUFF.
How old are you? We do NOT live in the same universe.
And WTF does that piece of communism called Cuba "rank better than us" in?
poverty? misery? jobless? absence of a life?