one fat chick calling another over weight...
on a side note did anybody way the fat cat chick? (yes i know this a poo f4rum)
Has anyone thrown the new iron on a scale yet?
- Thread starter Ace Freely
- Start date
one fat chick calling another over weight...
on a side note did anybody way the fat cat chick? (yes i know this a poo f4rum)
i would know what, weight watchers? nahhh, i jump on my heavy, reliable sled and ride the snot out of it.
Says the Ski-Doo guy. Weight doesn't matter right?
where did i say that?
i enjoy when guys lighten up their polaris. it makes them easier to tow out when they're broke down haha. but seriously.....i hope that new motor they put in the 16s works out better than, well, any 800 polaris has put in a sled in the past 10+ years. my 2 year sled rotation will be due for a new steed in the stable. maybe ill own one next year.
Thanks for posting up the weights! So how much more does a 163x3 weigh? If it's 25lbs diff between the T3 163 and 155x3 Axys, is it safe to say the "apples to apples" weight difference is 20 lbs between the 163 3 inchers?
Thoughts?
Ace
Thoughts?
Ace
Last edited:
800 155 2.6 track weighs in at 512.6 fully wet. Couldn't add another drop of oil or gas.
497.6 with a silber titanium can (that fits like garbage)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Was this a PRO RMK, Assault, or SKS? Beltdrive or chaincase. Supposedly the beltdrive PRO's with the 2.6" 155" track are 408# dry, and the 3" 155" are 421#, that's 13# difference. But in real life, wet weights are 517# vs 512# which is 5# difference... That's assuming this is a beltdrive sled.
You would need to weight each sled on the same scale to get difference. Whatever the difference is dry it will be the same wet unless you think they have a smaller gas or oil tank on a 3" chain case sled.
Each scale will be different by a few #'s
Each scale will be different by a few #'s
S
snowmobiler
Well-known member
how much does the deep snow polaris 174 weigh?
they dont make one.LOL
they dont make one.LOL
That's a great point. The 2016 PRO RMK 174 weighs 474lbs less then the 2016 Ski-Doo Summit 174 T3. Now that's impressive weight savings.
Has anyone found a big enough scale to weigh Doo's version? And how many sets of scratchers does that train need?
Those extra 31 pounds you mean. Only 1 set of scratchers are needed as long as you have a brain and aren't a complete toolbag
All I know is I go out to the garage every morning and lift the front and/or rear of my 16 and it makes me giggle how much lighter it is over my 15 or 14 
All I know is I go out to the garage every morning and lift the front and/or rear of my 16 and it makes me giggle how much lighter it is over my 15 or 14
make sure it's the sled, and not your recently lightened wallet thats playing mind games with you
Last edited:
i would know what, weight watchers? nahhh, i jump on my heavy, reliable sled and ride the snot out of it.
where did i say that?
i enjoy when guys lighten up their polaris. it makes them easier to tow out when they're broke down haha. but seriously.....i hope that new motor they put in the 16s works out better than, well, any 800 polaris has put in a sled in the past 10+ years. my 2 year sled rotation will be due for a new steed in the stable. maybe ill own one next year.
You say that like Doo hasn't had 800 motor problems.
not nearly as many as the recent 800 twins from poo. and I own a 2011 poo 800
