Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Don't miss out on all the fun! Register on our forums to post and have added features! Membership levels include a FREE membership tier.

Gripper Ski's vs USI Triple Threats?

The Bob

Well-known member
Premium Member
I was wondering if anyone has any opinion on running the stock grippers or using USI's that I have already? I have run Triple Threats on just about every sled for the past 5 years, but know that people really like the grippers. Wondering if anyone has experience with both. Running out of upgrade funds and figured I could sell one set or the other to re-coup, haha.

Thanks for any info or advice.
 
Never owned USI TTs, but if you like them, sell the grippers - lots of doo and cat buyers out there for grippers. The grippers on a wide or narrow setting will crack the rubber, and skis will land jart. There are options for that, too. FWIW.
 
Thanks! I do like the USI's and I will be doing a lot of flatland (trails, low snow) riding as I am in MN (do go outwest as much as possible). I just see a lot of people keeping the grippers on their sleds and was wondering if its that great of a ski. Again thanks.
 
i ran grippers on my past assaults '12 and '14 with 1.75 inch and 2.0 inch track respectively. the gripper is an excellent trail ski, it should be their stock trail ski and mountain ski.

they work best with stud boy shaper bars 6 inch work awesome. this year i am going to a 155'' track with stud boy 7.5 inch shapers.

the key is in the rubber stopper that allows the ski to flex, it's the piece between the spindle and the ski. the best option for this is better than polaris stock by far, Doo part#505071779.

i have seen too many stock polaris rubber stops blow out on trips.
 
Had usi ski's on my old pro when I bought it.
Ran em for two rides then bought grippers and peddled the usi.
Near zero float in powder and seemed like they darted where the grippers did not.
 
If your not going to run Grippers I prefer the SLP Mowhawks. A lot of development went into these and they are a great Powder ski.
 
USI are skis made by flatland riders for flatland riders. So probably great if you ride in MN but probably not so great if you ride in the MTNs or deep snow
 
Grippers are currently the best OEM pow ski. Weaknesses - They are rigid. Their saddle design is dumb. The keel will wash on the trail ride in and out without something like shapers (most say, so what). They drive impact energy (rocks) into the arms.

Their overall performance design for pow is really good - tapered width, light, float, short and rounded tail, aggressive head for lift, boot grips. Not expensive to replace. They really are a great OEM pow ski. All OEM pow skis have shortcomings. There are better all-around skis, like trails and pow, and skis for specific conditions, none of them cheap. Depends on how and where you ride, how much you just have to tune, and how much $$$ you want blow. Just beware of the rubber bump stops. With all of the patents on ski designs, the OEMs kinda have their hands tied right now, without buying someone else's design for ajillion dollars, working within their own patents or incremental improvements. Don't think any OEM will be paying ajillion - unless they are found guilty of patent infringement like BRP was - avg buyers just won't justify any cost increase. It is what it is.
 
Last edited:
Premium Features



Back
Top