M5- You asked the question why does CMX do it this way... and I answered.
The Gates PolyChain Carbon (Toothed) design manual (17595) warns against using backside-idlers with their toothed belts because of the damage they can cause to the belts...and that inside idlers are optimal according to gates. Mark at CMX has worked in close association with the designers at Gates for more than 10 years... This is WHY he chose the system design he did as his experience leads him down this path.
This is WHY CMX uses this design... I've talked at length with Mark about this over the years.
This has no bearing on why anyone else would do it any other way as this is a CMX thread.
The Gates design manual
The Gates PolyChain Carbon (Toothed) design manual (17595) warns against using backside-idlers with their toothed belts because of the damage they can cause to the belts...and that inside idlers are optimal according to gates. Mark at CMX has worked in close association with the designers at Gates for more than 10 years... This is WHY he chose the system design he did as his experience leads him down this path.
This is WHY CMX uses this design... I've talked at length with Mark about this over the years.
This has no bearing on why anyone else would do it any other way as this is a CMX thread.
The Gates design manual
I do have one question on the belt drive. Why run the belt outwards with the cogs over a smooth pulley rather than inwards on the back of the belt. It would make a more compact chaincase or use a cogged gear on the tensioner?
M5
M5... Backbending a belt is a "no no" according to gates.... that is why Mark builds his drive that way.
Hmmm. I'm not sure I'm buying that argument, the serpentine belt on my Duramax back bends all over the place. The Yeti kit does it backwards?
M5
Last edited: